Misrepresentations or violations of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees
Prompt reporting and decisive action on suspected violations of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees are essential to maintain integrity in government contracting.
Overview
FAR 3.405 outlines the procedures and responsibilities for addressing suspected or actual violations of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees, which prohibits improper influence or misrepresentation in government contracting. The section mandates that government personnel promptly report any suspicion or evidence of such violations to the contracting officer or higher authority, following agency procedures. Upon credible evidence or reasonable suspicion, the chief of the contracting office must review the facts and may take actions such as rejecting bids, annulling contracts, recovering fees, initiating suspension or debarment, or referring criminal matters to the Department of Justice. This process ensures integrity in the procurement process and enforces compliance with anti-contingent fee regulations.
Key Rules
- Reporting Suspected Violations
- Government personnel must promptly report suspected or actual violations to the contracting officer or higher authority.
- Review and Action by Contracting Office
- The chief of the contracting office must review evidence and may reject bids, annul contracts, recover fees, initiate suspension/debarment, or refer cases to the Department of Justice.
Responsibilities
- Contracting Officers: Investigate reported violations and take appropriate action.
- Contractors: Avoid improper influence and misrepresentation regarding contingent fees.
- Agencies: Establish procedures for reporting and handling violations; refer criminal matters as required.
Practical Implications
- This section exists to deter and address unethical practices in government contracting related to contingent fees.
- It impacts daily contracting by requiring vigilance, prompt reporting, and decisive action on violations.
- Common pitfalls include failure to report suspicions, inadequate documentation, or not following agency procedures.