36.602
Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts
FAR 36.602 mandates a qualifications-based, transparent process for selecting architect-engineer firms, emphasizing fair evaluation and compliance with statutory requirements.
Overview
FAR 36.602 outlines the procedures and requirements for selecting firms to perform architect-engineer (A-E) contracts. This section establishes the criteria, processes, and authorities involved in evaluating and choosing A-E firms, ensuring a fair and transparent selection based on qualifications rather than price. It covers the use of evaluation boards, their functions, the selection authority, and provides a streamlined process for contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. The goal is to ensure that the most qualified firms are chosen for government A-E projects, in compliance with the Brooks Act and related regulations.
Key Rules
- Selection Criteria (36.602-1)
- Firms are evaluated based on professional qualifications, specialized experience, capacity, past performance, and location, among other factors.
- Evaluation Boards (36.602-2 & 36.602-3)
- Boards are established to review and rank firms; their functions include evaluating submissions and recommending the most qualified firms.
- Selection Authority (36.602-4)
- The designated selection authority makes the final decision based on board recommendations.
- Short Selection Process (36.602-5)
- For contracts not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, a streamlined process may be used to expedite selection.
Responsibilities
- Contracting Officers: Ensure proper establishment of evaluation boards, adherence to selection criteria, and documentation of the process.
- Contractors: Submit qualifications and relevant documentation; respond to evaluation criteria.
- Agencies: Oversee the integrity of the selection process and ensure compliance with statutory requirements.
Practical Implications
- Ensures A-E contracts are awarded based on qualifications, not price, promoting quality and compliance.
- Requires careful documentation and transparency in the selection process.
- Common pitfalls include inadequate documentation, failure to follow criteria, or improper board composition.