Definitions
FAR 50.201 defines essential terms for SAFETY Act procurements, ensuring clarity and compliance in acquiring anti-terrorism technologies.
Overview
FAR 50.201 provides definitions for key terms related to the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies (SAFETY) Act of 2002, which governs the procurement and use of anti-terrorism technologies by the federal government. This section clarifies the meaning of terms such as "act of terrorism," "Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology (QATT)," "SAFETY Act designation," and related certifications and notices. Understanding these definitions is essential for contractors and contracting officers involved in the acquisition, development, or deployment of technologies intended to prevent or mitigate acts of terrorism.
Key Rules
- Definition of Act of Terrorism
- Specifies criteria for what constitutes an act of terrorism, including unlawfulness, harm caused, and use of methods intended for mass destruction.
- Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology (QATT)
- Defines QATT as technology designed to prevent or limit harm from terrorism, and details what types of products and services may qualify.
- SAFETY Act Designation and Certification
- Explains the process and meaning of receiving a SAFETY Act designation or certification from DHS, which impacts liability protections and procurement eligibility.
- Block Certification/Designation and Pre-qualification Notice
- Describes mechanisms for streamlining the approval and procurement of classes of anti-terrorism technologies.
Responsibilities
- Contracting Officers: Must use these definitions to determine eligibility and compliance for anti-terrorism technology procurements.
- Contractors: Should ensure their products or services meet the definitions and criteria for QATT and related SAFETY Act protections.
- Agencies: Oversee and enforce the correct application of these definitions in solicitations and awards.
Practical Implications
- This section ensures all parties have a common understanding of key terms, reducing ambiguity in anti-terrorism technology procurements.
- Accurate application of these definitions is critical for eligibility for SAFETY Act protections and streamlined procurement processes.
- Misunderstanding or misapplying these terms can result in ineligibility for liability protections or procurement opportunities.