Scope of part
FAR 6.000 defines the scope of competition requirements in federal contracting, emphasizing the need for full and open competition and outlining when exceptions apply.
Overview
FAR 6.000 establishes the scope of Part 6, which sets forth the policies and procedures designed to ensure full and open competition in federal acquisitions. It outlines the framework for promoting competition, including circumstances for full and open competition, competition after exclusion of sources, and situations where other than full and open competition is permitted. This section clarifies that Part 6 focuses on the methods and requirements for achieving competition, not on evaluating the results of competition, such as determining adequate price competition, which are addressed elsewhere (e.g., Part 15). The intent is to guide contracting professionals on when and how competition must be sought in the acquisition process, ensuring compliance with federal procurement law and policy.
Key Rules
- Promotion of Full and Open Competition
- Establishes the requirement to seek full and open competition in federal contracting whenever possible.
- Framework for Exceptions
- Provides for procedures when competition is limited, such as after exclusion of sources or when other than full and open competition is justified.
- Scope Limitation
- Clarifies that this part does not address the outcomes of competition, which are covered in other FAR parts.
Responsibilities
- Contracting Officers: Must understand and apply the competition requirements and exceptions as outlined in Part 6.
- Contractors: Should be aware of the competition framework to understand how opportunities are solicited and awarded.
- Agencies: Must advocate for competition and ensure acquisition processes comply with these policies.
Practical Implications
- This section sets the foundation for competitive federal procurement, ensuring transparency and fairness.
- It impacts how solicitations are structured and how exceptions to competition are justified.
- Common pitfalls include misunderstanding when exceptions to competition are allowed or failing to document the rationale for limited competition.