44.202
Contracting officer’s evaluation
Contracting officers must thoroughly evaluate and document subcontract consent requests to ensure compliance and protect government interests.
Overview
FAR 44.202 outlines the responsibilities and considerations for contracting officers when evaluating requests for consent to subcontract. This section ensures that contracting officers thoroughly review proposed subcontracts to protect the government's interests, verify compliance with contract requirements, and assess the contractor’s purchasing system. The evaluation process is designed to prevent issues such as excessive pass-through charges, unqualified subcontractors, or noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Key Rules
- Contracting Officer Responsibilities
- Contracting officers must review and evaluate subcontract consent requests to ensure they meet all regulatory and contractual requirements.
- Evaluation Considerations
- Officers must consider factors such as the contractor’s purchasing system, the reasonableness of subcontract prices, the necessity of the subcontract, and the qualifications of the proposed subcontractor.
Responsibilities
- Contracting Officers: Must conduct a thorough evaluation of subcontract consent requests, document their findings, and ensure all regulatory and contractual requirements are met.
- Contractors: Must submit complete and accurate consent requests, including all required supporting documentation, and comply with any additional information requests from the contracting officer.
- Agencies: Oversee the process to ensure compliance and protect government interests.
Practical Implications
- This section exists to ensure that subcontracting practices do not compromise contract performance or government interests.
- It impacts daily contracting by requiring careful documentation and justification for subcontracting decisions.
- Common pitfalls include incomplete submissions, failure to justify subcontractor selection, or overlooking regulatory requirements.