ALIGNMENT CLEAT SE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a firm-fixed-price contract modification, SPE4A526F2234, to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, with a total value of $124,090, for the delivery of one ALIGNMENT CLEAT SE, identified by NSN 5120016278556, under solicitation SPE4A5-25-T-740W. The award was issued on July 17, 2026, and performance is to be conducted at the contractor’s facility in Sunnyvale, California. The contract is administered by DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia, with Dean Allen listed as the contracting officer. No Contracting Officer’s Representative or Procuring Contracting Officer is specifically named beyond the CO. The delivery order is issued under contract SPE4A122G0004, and while the contract type is not explicitly stated, it is structured as a single-award action with no options or multi-year funding indicated. The technical specifications for the alignment cleat are not fully detailed in the available documentation, and there is no explicit reference to inspection criteria, quality standards, packaging requirements, or FOB terms. However, the contract incorporates FAR 52.222-90, requiring strict compliance with federal guidelines prohibiting the use of funds for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs deemed discriminatory, and mandates that this clause be flowed down to all subcontractors. The contractor must report any known violations by subcontractors and notify the contracting officer of any legal challenges to the provision. No socioeconomic status representations, small business certifications, or affirmative set-asides are indicated. The contractor holds a CAGE code of 90099 and is classified as other than small. No detailed payment office, invoicing method, or accounting appropriation data is specified, and the invoicing mechanism—whether WAWF, IPP, or another—is not confirmed. The place of performance is within the United States, and no international subcontracting is permitted under the clause. Inspection and acceptance responsibilities are not explicitly assigned, and no MIL-STD or industry-standard quality benchmarks are referenced in the materials provided. The contract was awarded without public disclosure of the evaluation factors, award rationale, or source selection methodology, leaving the basis of award—such as LPTA or trade-off—unstated.