Agent Skill · Per pursuit · capture stage · ~10 min per run
Price Assessment
Assess budget, buying behavior, and competitors before a live procurement reaches pricing.
Save as .claude/skills/price-assessment/SKILL.md or paste into any agent with the CLEATUS MCP connected.
What this skill does
- Separates published budget or ceiling facts from estimates based on comparable awards
- Profiles the contracting office from cited award history and available solicitation evidence
- Ranks four competitors using recent, relevant awards and explains the evidence for each
- Marks ABR, bidding posture, loss history, and evaluation tendencies insufficient when public evidence is absent
CLEATUS tools it drives
get_opportunitysearch_marketsearch_documentsget_capture_profile
A sample run
claude · price-assessment
$ claude "assess pricing for this pursuit"
● get_opportunity scope · office · value signals
Published ceiling absent · comparable-award path used
● search_market awards · office + agency · trailing 2 years
12 cited awards · 4 evidence-backed competitors
ABR: insufficient data · no labor hours or rate detail
Price assessment delivered with sources and gaps.The skill itself
This is the whole artifact: plain markdown your agent follows. Read it, edit it, make it yours.
.claude/skills/price-assessment/SKILL.md
---
name: cleatus-price-assessment
description: Assess pricing context for a government pursuit during capture. Research budget signals, buying-office award history, comparable awards, and four evidence-backed competitors. Run before a live procurement reaches bid pricing.
---
You produce a capture-stage price assessment using CLEATUS public market
intelligence. This is research, not a bottom-up cost build.
## Required inputs
- A pursuit or opportunity, or enough agency, office, scope, NAICS, PSC, and
period-of-performance detail to identify comparable work.
## Grounding rules
1. Label a government budget as published only when the opportunity or a cited
government document states it. Otherwise label the result an award-based
estimate with its comparables and confidence.
2. Cite every award amount, date, recipient, and office to a named award.
3. Do not derive ABR from total award value without cited labor hours, labor
categories, and rate data. Report "insufficient data" when those inputs are
absent.
4. Do not claim an office favors price or technical factors unless a cited
solicitation, award decision, or evaluation record supports it.
5. Public award history proves wins. It does not prove who submitted and lost.
Label unsupported loss history or competitor bidding posture "insufficient
public data."
6. Never invent or extrapolate a number without a cited award or published
source behind it.
## Playbook
1. Call get_opportunity for the scope, agency and office, vehicle, set-aside,
NAICS/PSC, period of performance, estimated value, and available documents.
2. Establish the budget signal:
- quote a published budget, funded amount, ceiling, or estimate when present;
- otherwise call search_market for comparable awards at the same office,
then widen to the agency and government-wide;
- present the comparable award values as context, not as an official budget.
3. Profile the contracting office from the trailing two years of cited awards:
award values, recipients, contract/pricing types, competition fields, and
representative examples. Search documents for evaluation evidence when it
is available. State which requested tendencies cannot be established.
4. Build the competitive field. Rank four contractors by relevant award
recency, value, office overlap, and scope overlap. For each, explain why it
belongs, cite recent wins, and distinguish observed award behavior from
inferred posture.
5. Produce the trailing-two-year award table. Include ABR only when a cited
source publishes enough labor detail to calculate it. Otherwise put
"insufficient data" in the ABR cell.
6. Deliver:
- data-readiness summary;
- budget signal and confidence;
- contracting-office evidence and limitations;
- cited award table;
- four-competitor table with wins and evidence gaps;
- explicit "insufficient data" list.
## If CLEATUS is not connected yet
1. Fetch https://www.cleat.ai/llms-full.txt and read it (tools, auth, endpoints).
2. Add the MCP server: https://www.cleat.ai/api/mcp/mcp (OAuth 2.1; the user signs in once).
3. No account? Send the user to https://www.cleat.ai/authentication/signup?utm_source=agent-skill and wait.Or install straight from the terminal:
terminal
mkdir -p .claude/skills/price-assessment &&
curl -fsSL https://www.cleat.ai/agents/skills/price-assessment/SKILL.md -o .claude/skills/price-assessment/SKILL.mdMore ways to run this
Browse the full skills directory, or set up your platform in minutes.
Price Assessment FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
No. It reports a published budget only when a government source states one. It can provide cited comparable-award values when no budget is published, but it will not call those values the government budget. ABR requires labor-rate and hours data that public award records usually do not contain, so the skill reports insufficient data instead of manufacturing a rate.
