2.101
Definitions
FAR 2.101 matters because the definition assigned to a product, service, contract action, or business relationship often determines which FAR rules, clauses, certifications, and procedures apply.
Overview
- FAR 2.101 is the FAR’s master definitions section. It establishes baseline meanings for words and terms used throughout the FAR unless a specific part, subpart, or section provides a different definition.
- For contracting professionals, this section is foundational because classification of a product, service, contract action, or business relationship often determines which FAR rules apply.
Key Rules
- Chapter-wide definitions and cross-references
- Definitions in FAR 2.101 generally control across the FAR, but users must check for section-specific definitions where the regulation provides a cross-reference or expressly changes the meaning.
- Core acquisition and contract concepts
- The section defines central terms such as acquisition, acquisition planning, contract, claim, change order, and assignment of claims, which shape how procurements are planned, awarded, administered, and disputed.
- Commerciality, construction, and service classifications
- It provides critical definitions for commercial product, commercial service, COTS item, construction, architect-engineer services, and advisory and assistance services. These definitions drive solicitation strategy, clause selection, competition approach, and statutory treatment.
- Small business and organizational concepts
- Terms such as affiliates, bundling, consolidation, and business unit affect market research, set-aside analysis, and small business participation.
Responsibilities
- Contracting Officers: Apply the correct FAR 2.101 definition, verify whether a more specific FAR section overrides it, and use these definitions to select procedures, clauses, and acquisition strategies.
- Contractors: Understand how their offerings and business relationships are classified, especially for commerciality, claims, subcontracting, and small business implications.
- Agencies: Maintain consistent interpretation across acquisitions and ensure planning, competition, and administration decisions align with the governing definitions.
Practical Implications
- This section exists to create a common vocabulary across federal procurement.
- Misclassifying an item as commercial, overlooking bundling, or submitting an uncertified claim over $100,000 can trigger compliance errors, delays, protests, or disputes.
- The main pitfall is assuming an everyday meaning applies when FAR 2.101 or a cross-referenced section provides a specialized regulatory definition.
