ACO-P Cyber School

The contract solicitation W9124926RA017, titled ACO-P Cyber School, is issued by the Department of Defense through the W6QM Micc-Ft Gordon office in Fort Gordon, Georgia, for instructional support services in support of the U.S. Army Cyber Center of Excellence. The effort requires a firm fixed price contract to provide comprehensive training and administrative resources under a Performance Work Statement that mandates compliance with DoD cybersecurity workforce standards, including DoD 8140 and DoDI 3305.09, and adherence to the Army Learning Concept 2015. All contractor personnel must be U.S. citizens with the ability to obtain and maintain a Top Secret clearance with Sensitive Compartmented Information eligibility, and the contractor must hold a Top Secret facility clearance as specified in the DD Form 254. Performance is centered at Fort Gordon with a base year running from July 6, 2026, to July 5, 2027, and two optional one-year extensions through July 5, 2029. Key deliverables include developing government-owned training materials, providing classroom support, submitting 100% daily attendance reports on the same day classes occur, and maintaining a Quality Control Plan with procedures for continuous improvement, corrective actions, root cause analysis, and trend monitoring. Proposals must be submitted in four volumes by the revised deadline of June 2, 2026, with Volume I containing administrative documents including the SF 1449 and representations, Volume II detailing technical approach aligned with the PWS without pricing, Volume III presenting past performance from three to five relevant government contracts with completed consent forms from subcontractors, and Volume IV submitting an editable Excel pricing worksheet that includes full compensation calculations, fringe benefits, G&A, and profit, with final figures in whole dollars and all formulas intact. Evaluation will be conducted under a Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable framework, where Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price are assessed in that order with no trade-offs permitted between cost and non-cost factors. Technical proposals must meet minimum requirements to be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable, while past performance is evaluated based on relevance, recency, and confidence, requiring detailed documentation of contract outcomes, cost and schedule performance, and corrective actions. Invoicing is strictly through WAWF as a 2-in-1 submission tied to monthly progress reports and trip logs, with manual invoices rejected. Contract administration requires compliance