ADHESIVE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under basic contract SPE8ES24D0005 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, CAGE 79343, for the procurement of adhesive material identified by NSN 8040001449774 and part number 3145RTV GRAY. The total contract value is $538.44, with a single line item for four containers delivered FOB Destination to Creech Air Force Base, Nevada, with a required delivery deadline of July 31, 2026. The award, issued on July 17, 2026, constitutes a streamlined acquisition under a pre-established indefinite-delivery vehicle, with no option quantities or variations permitted. The contractor is responsible for all transportation costs and must ship via traceable means, explicitly prohibiting parcel post for RDD 777 shipments. Packaging and marking requirements mandate that all packages and documentation be labeled with the base contract number SPE8ES24D0005 and the delivery order number SPE8ES26F63WV in designated blocks. Acceptance occurs at the destination, managed by government personnel per contract compliance, with no specific technical or quality standards beyond general conformity to contract requirements. The awardee is certified as a small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business, triggering ongoing compliance obligations under FAR Parts 19.13 and 19.15, including annual certifications and potential program audits. The order operates under Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) authority per 15 CFR 700, requiring priority performance and reporting. Payment will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service at P.O. Box 182317, Columbus, Ohio, with accounting data identified as BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189. The administering official is Nate Prattico, serving as the Contracting Officer Representative, reachable via DLA email and phone. Transportation Authorization Codes S8EF and S9NA are referenced for billing purposes, and electronic data interchange is confirmed as the accepted method of submission. No formal clause numbering under FAR or DFARS is provided, nor are MIL-STD specifications cited, indicating a minimalistic, administrative execution under an existing contract framework, with award likely driven by price and compliance rather than technical evaluation