ADHESIVE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under the basic contract SPE8ES-24-D-0005 to ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics, identified by CAGE code 79343, for the procurement of 2 kilograms of adhesive with National Stock Number 8040001182695. The total contract value is $53.36, with delivery required by August 7, 2026, at the destination address in Eastover, South Carolina. The order is FOB destination, meaning the contractor assumes all freight costs and risk until delivery is complete. The award was issued on July 17, 2026, and the contracting office is DLA Troop Support Construction and Equipment. The contractor has certified itself as a small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business, and the order is classified as a rated order under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (15 CFR 700), requiring priority performance. Packaging and marking requirements mandate that all shipments and documentation include both the basic contract number and the delivery order number, while prohibiting parcel post and requiring traceable shipping methods. No specific preservation, packaging standards, or barcoding requirements are detailed in the order, and no MIL-STD references are cited. Inspection and acceptance occur at the destination point by the government, with no technical specifications or quality standards beyond compliance with the contract terms and DPAS regulations. The payment will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service using remittance address PO Box 182317, Columbus, OH 43218-2317, with the AAC code BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189. Invoicing is handled via DD Form 1155, and the contracting administration is overseen by Nate Prattico of DLA Troop Support. Although the contract is structured as a delivery order under an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity framework, it is a single-line-item, fixed-price procurement with no options, variations, or escalation clauses. No explicit FAR clauses are listed in the document, but standard terms and conditions are incorporated by reference from the base contract. The award appears to have been based on a lowest price technically acceptable approach due to the simplicity of the requirement and lack of qualitative evaluation factors.