BATTERY, STORAGE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under basic contract SPE7LX26D0001 to STRYTEN ENERGY LLC (CAGE 20038) for the procurement of four units of BATTERY, STORAGE (NSN 6140014469506) at a unit price of $168.50, resulting in a total contract value of $674.00. The award was issued on July 21, 2026, with a firm delivery deadline of August 4, 2026, and requires shipment FOB destination to the specified address in Des Moines, Iowa. Performance is governed by the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS 15 CFR 700), which mandates priority handling, and prohibits the use of parcel post for shipping. The contractor is responsible for all transportation costs and risks until delivery at the destination, where final inspection and acceptance are conducted by a government representative. Packaging, preservation, and labeling requirements are detailed exclusively in a referenced "PID, Packaging, and Marking" attachment accessible through the official e-document interface, though no specific MIL-STD or technical standards are cited within the primary document. Payment will be processed electronically via EDI under the Fast Pay provision (FAR 52.213-1), with remittance directed to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, using payment code SL4701 and appropriation line BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189. The contract includes no option quantities, price variations, or modification references, indicating a strictly fixed, single-line-item order with no flexibility in quantity or cost. The contracting officer is Jeffrey Dixius, and administrative support is provided by DLA Land and Maritime’s Land Supply Chain Strategic Acquisition Program Directorate, with no designated COR/COTR identified. The award reflects a simplified acquisition process, consistent with low-dollar value and commercial item procurement practices, and the absence of socioeconomic certifications, evaluation factors, or special contract clauses beyond logistical and payment conditions supports the inference that selection was likely based on Lowest Price Technically Acceptable criteria.