BEARING, BALL, AIRFRAME

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a firm-fixed-price contract valued at $123,318.00 to RBC AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS, INC. (CAGE 3NPS1) on July 21, 2026, under solicitation SPE4A6-26-T-333G and contract number SPE4A626PB494, for the procurement of a single line item: BEARING, BALL, AIRFRAME (NSN 3110000345257). Performance is to occur at the contractor’s facility in Torrington, Connecticut, with delivery expected within the United States. The contract falls under NAICS code 332991 and is administered by DLA Aviation’s ASC Commodities Division, with Dean Allen serving as the Contracting Officer, reachable at CARL.ALLEN@DLA.MIL. No Contracting Officer’s Representative or Technical Representative information is provided, nor are specific inspection locations, acceptance criteria, or detailed packaging and marking requirements identified in the available data. The delivery schedule, FOB terms, payment office details, invoicing method, and accounting appropriation data are also not specified, though modifications may address these in the future. The contract incorporates FAR 52.222-90 pursuant to Department of Defense Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, requiring the contractor to prohibit any form of race-, sex-, color-, national origin-, disability-, religion-, or sexual orientation-based discrimination in its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs. The contractor must flow this clause down to all subcontractors, report any known or reasonably knowable violations by subcontractors, and notify the Contracting Officer within 10 days if any legal challenge is filed against the clause’s application. Noncompliance constitutes a material breach eligible for False Claims Act liability. No socioeconomic certifications, small business status, or unique entity identifier are explicitly confirmed, though the CAGE code is provided. There are no listed attachments, option quantities, or detailed technical specifications beyond the NSN, and no evaluation factors or award methodology are disclosed, though the fixed price and singular line item suggest a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable approach. The contract lacks specific details on inspection standards, quality control metrics, or military specifications, relying instead on general FAR and DFARS compliance.