BEARING, SLEEVE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a micro-purchase contract to KAMPI COMPONENTS CO INC (CAGE 7Z016) for one sleeve bearing (NSN 3120016105345) at a total price of $299.97, with an award date of July 28, 2026, under solicitation SPE4A0-26-T-3997. The contract is classified as a fixed-price delivery order under simplified acquisition procedures with FOB Origin terms, requiring delivery to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, within five days of contract award. All packaging, preservation, and marking must comply with MIL-STD-2073-1E, MIL-STD-129, and DLA’s RP001 palletization standards, including bar-coding and HAZMAT labeling per 29 CFR 1910.1200, while Item Unique Identification is not required. The contractor must submit hazard warning labels for approval prior to shipment and ensure compliance with all relevant transportation, safety, and documentation requirements. Delivery and acceptance occur at the destination, with inspection governed by MIL-STD-1916, MIL-STD-105, and other quality standards, requiring zero non-conformances unless otherwise specified. Invoicing is exclusively through WAWF using electronic payment systems, with financial routing handled via DoDAAC and no payment information provided in the contract itself. The contract incorporates numerous Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses, including mandatory provisions on employment eligibility verification, combating human trafficking, equal opportunity for workers with disabilities, sustainable products, hazardous materials identification, and cybersecurity safeguards consistent with NIST SP 800-171 DOD assessment requirements. Deviation 2026-00038 applies to most February 2026 clause versions, while specific alternates and fill-ins are included for clauses related to contracting type, subcontracting, and inspection. The contractor is subject to accelerated payments for small business subcontractors and prohibited from requiring internal confidentiality agreements. No bid evaluation factors or award basis are explicitly defined in the solicitation, but the low contract value and simplified acquisition context suggest a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology. The contract makes no reference to options, multiple award structures, or extended performance periods, and no attachments or formal list of documents were provided beyond the required compliance documentation such as material safety data sheets and