BRACKET, EYE, ROTATIN

The contract solicitation SPE7L1-26-T-876T is for a single rotating eye bracket, NSN 3040-01-501-9073, under a fixed-price arrangement with delivery required within 20 days after award to Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard in Hawaii. The procurement is managed by the Defense Logistics Agency’s Land Supply Chain under NAICS code 332510, with a response deadline of August 6, 2026, and submission exclusively through the DIBBS portal. Performance is FOB origin, and acceptance occurs at the destination, with government personnel responsible for inspection based on MIL-STD-2073-1E for packaging and MIL-STD-129 for marking and labeling, including barcoding and adherence to preservation standards. The item must be packaged with a unit quantity of one, using specific preservation and container codes, and palletized per DLA’s RP001 requirements. Safety Data Sheets must be submitted for any hazardous materials under Clause 52.223-3, and mercury content is restricted except for limited functional uses. The contract incorporates multiple FAR and DFARS clauses mandating compliance with employment equity, anti-trafficking, employment verification, sustainable product use, and cybersecurity standards including NIST SP 800-171 and safeguarding covered defense information, with deviations noted for clauses related to changes, subcontracting, and system safeguarding. Payment must be processed electronically via WAWF, and contractors must be registered with a UEI code and provide representations regarding small business status, including participation in HUBZone, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB, or EDWOSB programs if applicable. Affirmative representations for covered telecommunications equipment or joint ventures require additional disclosures. The contract includes provisions for accelerated payments to small business subcontractors and enforces unenforceability of unauthorized obligations, with no pricing data available for the single line item, leaving the estimated value undetermined. All offerors must comply with DLA’s automated simplified acquisition procedures, and no evaluation factors or basis of award are explicitly stated, suggesting a potential lowest price technically acceptable approach.