BUNGEE ASSEMBLY

The contract awarded to Capy Machine Shop Inc. under contract number SPE4A726P5194, issued by the Defense Logistics Agency on July 21, 2026, is a total small business set-aside valued at $323,679.70 under NAICS code 332710, focused on the procurement of a Bungee Assembly with associated production lot testing and government first article testing. The work is performed at the contractor’s facility in Melville, New York, with no specific delivery or performance period outlined, suggesting an as-needed or milestone-driven fulfillment mechanism. Key deliverables include the manufactured bungee assembly identified by NSN 1560001079006, along with contractor-conducted production lot testing and formal government first article testing, all subject to government inspection and acceptance without explicit location or standard criteria detailed in the documentation. The contract includes no specified quantities, unit prices, or option periods, and no packaging, preservation, or marking requirements are defined beyond the implicit use of standard military item identification practices through the NSN and Standard Form 30. Compliance with FAR 52.222-90 is a central contractual requirement, mandating strict adherence to federal directives prohibiting racially discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion activities, with obligations to report subcontractor noncompliance, furnish records upon request, and flow down the clause to subcontracts unless performed entirely outside the United States. This clause, implemented through deviation 2026-00040 and revision 1, ties the contractor to active monitoring and reporting responsibilities under recent executive orders and OMB memoranda. The contracting officer, Dean Allen, and the DLA Aviation office in Richmond, Virginia, administer the contract with no assigned contracting officer’s representative or technical representative identified. Payment office, accounting data, invoicing methods, and delivery terms remain unspecified, and no MIL-STDs, quality standards, or technical specifications beyond the clause’s administrative conditions are referenced. The solicitation was competed under a small business set-aside with no evaluation factors, source selection criteria, or pricing breakdown disclosed, suggesting a likely lowest price technically acceptable award approach, though unconfirmed. All documentation reflects a narrowly scoped, compliance-driven acquisition centered on product delivery and DEI policy enforcement rather than complex technical or logistical requirements.