CABLE ASSEMBLY, PRIN

The contract, awarded to Raytheon Company under solicitation SPE4A6-25-Q-1746 and assigned contract number SPE4A626PT034, is a firm-fixed-price arrangement valued at $979,602.00 for the procurement of two cable assembly items: NSN 5995015305432 and NSN 5995015305439, with quantities of 48 and 2,000 units respectively. Delivery is required within 730 days of award, with FOB origin terms specifying the DLA Aviation ASC Commodities Division in Richmond, Virginia as the delivery point, though inspection and acceptance occur at Raytheon’s facility in El Segundo, California. The contract employs strict compliance with MIL-STD-129 for packaging, labeling, and barcoding, including special markings for Product Verification Test Samples and First Article Test samples, and requires adherence to RP001 for DLA-specific packaging requirements. All hazardous materials must be labeled per 29 CFR 1910.1200, accompanied by compliant Safety Data Sheets submitted prior to award, with flow-down obligations to subcontractors and obligations to use U.S.-flag vessels for ocean shipments unless a waiver is secured 45 days in advance. The contract incorporates a comprehensive set of Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses mandating small business program representation, whistleblower protections, cybersecurity safeguards under DFARS 252.204-7012, antiterrorism awareness training, and contractor obligations related to compensation of former DoD officials. Invoicing is exclusively through Wide Area WorkFlow, with payment routed through the Columbus, Ohio office, and accounting data identified by the code BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189. Quality assurance is governed by ISO 9001:2015, with acceptance criteria based on AQL levels of 0.1 for critical, 1.0 for major, and 4.0 for minor defects. Mandatory First Article Testing and source approval through SAR are required before production. The contractor must comply with DPAS prioritization, ensuring this contract takes precedence over non-rated work, and retain full liability for regulatory compliance regarding hazardous materials. While no formal evaluation factors are detailed, the presence of technical, quality, and socio