CABLE ASSEMBLY, SPEC

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Raytheon Company, identified by CAGE code 54X10, a contract modification valued at $29,175.60 under contract number SPE7M826P0833, originally solicited under SPE7M8-26-T-0022, with an award date of July 13, 2026. The contract encompasses the procurement of a single line item: a cable assembly identified by National Stock Number 5995017218542 and part number 7012619773, to be manufactured and delivered from Raytheon’s facility in Fairdale, Kentucky. The transaction was executed via a unilateral modification under simplified acquisition procedures consistent with FAR 13.302(a) or FAR 12.303(a), indicating a low-dollar, non-competitive or limited-competition action. The contract includes only one clause, FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, amended under Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which mandates compliance with equal opportunity policies prohibiting discrimination based on participation in diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. No additional contract clauses, attachments, or special requirements such as security clearances, key personnel designations, or option periods are specified. Packaging and labeling adhere to standard DoD practices, requiring the NSN and CAGE code to be clearly marked on the item and its packaging, with barcoding implied but not explicitly defined. Inspection and acceptance responsibilities rest with the Government, specifically the Contracting Officer, Michael Finken, located at DLA Land and Maritime in Columbus, Ohio. Delivery is expected to the contractor’s facility, with no FOB terms or specific delivery schedule stated. The NAICS code 335929 is associated with this procurement, classifying it under support activities for aerospace products and parts. Invoicing and payment processing will be administered through DLA Land and Maritime’s designated office in Columbus, Ohio, with no accounting data, appropriation codes, or specific invoicing system such as WAWF or IPP identified. Representations and certifications by the contractor were not explicitly provided, though the CAGE code confirms entity identity. The contract does not include performance metrics, quality standards, or technical specifications beyond the NSN, and no evaluations or award rationale details are documented in the available materials