CAP, FILLER OPENING

The contract is a delivery order issued under the broader indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity requirements contract SPE7LX-21-D-0087, awarded by the Defense Logistics Agency to Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. (CAGE 1CAY9), with a total price of $21.44 for a single item: CAP, FILLER OPENING (NSN 2930006358296). The delivery order, referenced as SPE7LX26FB96P, was awarded on July 31, 2026, with delivery scheduled for August 7, 2026, to Fort Bliss, Texas, under FOB Destination terms. The overarching contract spans a base period of four years (April 1, 2021, through March 31, 2025) with three optional two-year periods that could extend performance through March 31, 2031, with a total estimated value ranging from $91.6 million to $229 million across all potential line items and options. The contract includes mandatory compliance with cybersecurity standards under NIST SP 800-171 Rev 1, requiring the contractor to maintain and report a current assessment in the DoD Supplier Performance Risk System, and prohibits the acquisition of covered telecommunications equipment from designated foreign vendors. Packaging and shipping instructions require delivery by the fastest traceable means, excluding parcel post, with all packages marked in block letters using specific identifiers including TCN W90HDC62120005, RDD N, TP 1, and FACILITY CODE 1CAY9. Inspection and acceptance are performed by the government, either at origin or destination, depending on the Place of Inspection Code. The contractor’s billing address is in Virginia Beach, Virginia, with payments processed through the Defense Finance and Accounting Service using WAWF for invoicing. All applicable clauses are incorporated as standard FAR and DFARS provisions without modifications, including requirements for printed materials on postconsumer fiber paper, representation and certification incorporation, cybersecurity incident reporting, and limitations on subcontracting with controlled firms. No formal evaluation factors or weights are specified, but the use of a trade-off process is implied rather than a lowest-price technically acceptable method. No attachments are fully described, and no additional socioeconomic set-asides were applied, though the offeror likely represented as a small business. The contract structure supports high-volume