CAP SCREW SCH SLFLK

The contract solicitation N0010426QFD80 is a total small business set-aside under FAR 19.5 for the procurement of 40 units of CAP SCREW SCH SLFLK, identified by NSN 1HM 5305-01-733-0460, with all requirements governed by military and defense standards. The solicitation, posted on May 6, 2026, with a response deadline of June 5, 2026, targets small businesses as defined by NAICS code 332722 and requires strict compliance with packaging, preservation, and marking specifications outlined in MIL-STD-2073-1 and MIL-STD-129, including Level A or B packaging based on shipment type, proper ESD protection for sensitive components, and DLR labeling with blue background and yellow text for eligible items. Barcoding must use Data Matrix symbology with concatenated Unique Item Identifiers, and shelf-life requirements mandate at least 85% of the remaining shelf life upon delivery. Inspection and acceptance are to occur at the destination, specifically at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, ME, under the authority of the DCMA QAR, with quality systems compliant with ISO 9001 or MIL-I-45208 required. The contract mandates adherence to higher-level quality requirements, prompt payment terms, electronic funds transfer via SAM, and compliance with cybersecurity protocols including NIST SP 800-171 and mandatory cyber incident reporting within 72 hours. Contract administration is managed by the Navsup Weapon Systems Support office in Mechanicsburg, PA, with Ashton K. Perry as the primary point of contact, and all invoicing must be processed through WAWF. The period of performance allows 186 days from issuance, with delivery due by November 8, 2026, under FOB Destination terms. Offerors must represent their small business status through SAM, provide a UEI and CAGE code, and comply with federal requirements including combating human trafficking, whistleblower protections, and subcontractor flow-down obligations. Award will be made through a best-value trade-off process, prioritizing past performance as measured by the Supplier Performance Risk System over price, and the contract explicitly excludes LPTA evaluation.