CIRCUIT CARD ASSEMB

The solicitation SPE4A1-26-T-2062 seeks 14 units of a circuit card assembly with NSN 5998-01-643-2784, to be delivered FOB origin to the DLA Distribution facility in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, within 397 days after order placement. The contract mandates strict compliance with military packaging and handling standards, requiring all components to be protected against electrostatic discharge and electromagnetic interference using DOD-qualified materials per MIL-PRF-81705, with Type I and Type III barrier materials specified depending on cushioning provisions. Packaging must adhere to MIL-STD-2073-1E and MIL-STD-129 for labeling, barcoding, and preservation, including the special marking “39-39 ESD sensitiv electricn dvc” and QPL-81705 compliance indicators. Physical identification and bare item marking are required under RQ017, though item unique identification is waived. All barrier materials must originate from qualified manufacturers listed on QPL-81705, and handling must occur at approved ESD/EMI protective workstations. The contractor is obligated to ensure compliance with hazardous material labeling under 29 CFR 1910.1200, and any item susceptible to ESD/EMI degradation without specified protection requires submission of technical packaging documentation. Cybersecurity compliance is critical under DFARS 252.204-7012 and NIST SP 800-171, requiring a full assessment submitted via SPRS, with flow-down obligations to subcontractors. The contract includes mandatory clauses covering employment of workers with disabilities, combating human trafficking, SAM maintenance, sustainable product use, and prohibition on mandatory confidentiality agreements. Payment must be processed via WAWF, with no alternative invoicing methods permitted. No pricing details are provided, leaving the contract value undetermined. Offerors must submit proposals electronically via DIBBS by May 18, 2026, and are expected to affirm representations regarding entity identifiers, size status, socioeconomic categories, and compliance with telecommunications equipment prohibitions. The contract type and evaluation methodology remain unspecified, though award is likely driven by compliance with stringent technical, cybersecurity, and packaging requirements.