COATINGKIT, CHEMICAL

The contract is a delivery order issued under the basic indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract SPE4AX16D9010 by the Defense Logistics Agency, specifically through its Aviation division, to ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics, LLC, identified by CAGE code 79343. The delivery order, identified as SPE4A626FCXDY, was awarded on July 21, 2026, with a total value of $434.70 for the supply of five chemical coating kits, identified by NSN 6850015903119 and part number FP-050-2-36320, at a unit price of $86.94. Delivery is required by August 10, 2026, to ASD Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, with FOB Destination terms placing all transportation risk and responsibility on the contractor until the items are received at the specified delivery location. The awardee has certified its status as a small business and also as a small disadvantaged women-owned business, triggering compliance with FAR Part 19 and associated reporting obligations. All shipments must be sent via fastest traceable means, excluding parcel post, and must be clearly marked with the transaction control number N4339A6202A963, the delivery order number, and the receiving depot designator RDD 777. Invoicing must be submitted electronically through WAWF in accordance with DFARS 252.232-7003, and government acceptance will occur upon inspection at the delivery site. The contract is prioritized under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) as defined by 15 CFR 700, requiring timely performance as a rated order. Payment will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, following receipt of proper documentation and acceptance. There are no options, modifications, or additional line items listed, and no specific packaging, preservation, or bar-coding standards beyond the minimal marking requirements are referenced. The contract administration is managed by DLA Aviation, with Holly Dunganan as the local administrative contact and Amanda Parker serving as the government representative responsible for certification and delivery. No formal evaluation factors, technical specifications, or MIL-STD references are included, suggesting the award was based on price and compliance with minimal administrative criteria under a low-value, straightforward procurement.