COMPENSATOR ASSEMBL

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded contract SPE4A726P5135 to S3 AERODEFENSE LLC, located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for the supply of a compensator assembly with NSN 1660006253093 at a total fixed price of $74,076.00, with the award issued on July 21, 2026, under solicitation SPE4A7-25-T-509R. The contract is structured as a firm-fixed-price arrangement and includes a single line item for the specified component, with no options, modifications beyond P00001, or additional pricing structures defined. Performance is to be completed at the contractor’s facility in Milwaukee, and while the period of performance and delivery schedule are not explicitly detailed, the award date and modification timeline indicate an active contract requiring immediate fulfillment. The procurement is administered by DLA Aviation’s ASC Commodities Division in Richmond, Virginia, with Dean Allen designated as the Procuring Contracting Officer, though no Contracting Officer’s Representative or technical point of contact is named. The contract is governed by FAR 52.222-90, "Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors," under Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which mandates strict compliance with non-discrimination standards in employment and subcontractor practices, prohibits racially discriminatory DEI programs, requires reporting of subcontractor violations, and obligates flowdown of the clause to all subcontracts performed within the United States. Compliance with this clause is deemed material to payment, and failure to meet its requirements may result in financial consequences. No specific packaging, inspection, marking, or technical performance standards are outlined in the provided documentation, nor are there any identified socioeconomic certifications, size status designations, or invoicing methods specified. The contractor must maintain records accessible to the government for audit and compliance verification, and any legal challenges by subcontractors regarding the DEI clause must be reported promptly. Electronic submission via email to the PCO is implied, and the contract was issued under a standard modification form without reference to traditional evaluation factors, cost analysis, or source selection methodology, suggesting an award based on availability, responsiveness, or regulatory compliance rather than competitive technical scoring.