CORROSION PREVENTIV

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under contract SPE8ES-24-D-0005 to ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics, LLC (CAGE 79343) for the procurement of two units of corrosion preventive material identified by NSN 8030000627580, at a total price of $990.64. The award was issued on July 13, 2026, under delivery order SPE8ES26F59MC, with delivery required by July 21, 2026, to a destination at the U.S. Air Force Property Co, Korean Air Lines in Gangseo, Korea. The contract operates under FOB destination terms, meaning the contractor is responsible for all transportation costs and risks until the item arrives at the final delivery point. The item must be preserved against corrosion, with packaging suitable for parcel post or similar delivery methods, and all shipments must be clearly marked with the basic contract number SPE8ES-24-D-0005 and the delivery order number SPE8ES26F59MC, although no additional labeling such as NSN, lot numbers, or handling symbols are specified. The contractor is a verified Women-Owned Small Business, and the order is set aside for small businesses under socioeconomic categories including Women-Owned Small Business, with compliance obligations tied to FAR 52.219-28 and DFARS 252.219-7003. Invoicing must be submitted electronically through Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) as mandated by DFARS 252.232-7003, with payment coordinated through the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, using payment code SL4701 and the provided remittance address. This transaction is classified as a rated order under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) per 15 CFR 700, requiring expedited processing, and although no specific MIL-STD or technical specification documents are cited, adherence to DLAD Procurement Notes C19 and C20 for transportation is implied. The contracting officer representative is Nate Prattico with the DLA Troop Support office, and oversight is managed by the Administrative Contracting Office in Philadelphia. No formal contract clauses, attachments, or evaluation factors were explicitly detailed in the documentation, and the award appears to be based on price, consistent with a Lowest Price Techn