16--CUSHION,SEAT BACK,A

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE4A726V2652 to KAMPI COMPONENTS CO INC, with a CAGE code of 7Z016, for a total price of $182,405.92 on July 21, 2026. The contract stems from solicitation SPE4A7-26-T-014A and encompasses a single line item: CUSHION, SEAT BACK, A, identified by NSN 1680995098300. Performance is located at the contractor’s facility at 88 Canal Rd, Fairless Hills, PA, and the work falls under NAICS code 326140, which typically applies to rubber and plastic product manufacturing. Although the contract type is not explicitly stated, the nature of the acquisition and the firm-fixed-price amount suggest a standard firm-fixed-price arrangement. Critical administrative and compliance requirements are driven by the inclusion of FAR 52.222-90, as modified by Deviation 2026-00040 Revision 1, which prohibits contractors from engaging in prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion practices and mandates that these requirements flow down to subcontracts, excluding those performed entirely outside the United States. Contractors must report violations and cooperate with investigations, with noncompliance potentially leading to suspension, termination, or debarment. No other clause-specific requirements, technical specifications, quality standards, packaging, marking, or preservation instructions were provided in the documentation, and no detailed inspection or acceptance criteria were defined. The placing of performance is within the United States, and delivery or shipment terms such as FOB are not specified. The contracting officer is Dean Allen, reachable at [email hidden], with no identified contract specialist, technical representative, or COR assigned in the records. The government’s payment office, invoicing method, and accounting data including TAS, AAC, or ACRN lines remain unspecified. While the CAGE code is confirmed, no formal representations or certifications from the offeror regarding socioeconomic status, small business size, or unique entity ID were found in Section K. No attachments, evaluation factors, or detailed delivery schedules were documented, and the award likely followed an LPTA methodology based on the simplicity of the commercial item and lack of technical evaluation parameters.