DCR CORE RECORD NO. 404692

The City of Los Angeles, through its Department of Cannabis Regulation, has authorized the operation of a cannabis manufacturing facility at 3335 E. Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90023, under a manufacturing license application submitted by Lee & Brady LLC. The activity involves the use of an existing industrial warehouse zoned M3-1-CUGU for licensed cannabis processing, with no new construction proposed. Operations are scheduled for Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM, with minimal traffic impact estimated at three vehicle trips per week, and will utilize existing utilities including water and power infrastructure managed by the City of Los Angeles and the Department of Water and Power. The project has been determined to qualify for a Class 1 and Class 32 Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as it constitutes an environmentally benign infill development consistent with the General Plan and local zoning, eliminating the need for further environmental analysis. Compliance with applicable Los Angeles Municipal Code sections and oversight from the Department of Building and Safety, Fire Department, and State Water Resources Control Board is required, but no formal contract clauses, pricing, or delivery schedules were specified in the documentation. The entity, Lee & Brady LLC, has affirmed its eligibility for certain socioeconomic designations, including HUBZone qualification and location within a federally designated Opportunity Zone and State Enterprise Zone, though no formal small business status or unique entity identifier was provided. The lead point of contact for the project is Jason Killeen, Assistant Executive Director of the Department of Cannabis Regulation, with Sang Hun Lee serving as Neighborhood Liaison. No federal acquisition regulation provisions, contract clauses, payment details, invoicing methods, or contracting officer representatives were identified in the materials, indicating the submission is a local regulatory application rather than a federally governed procurement contract. The core documentation represents an internal administrative approval process under municipal, not federal, contracting frameworks, with the DCR serving as the sole approving authority. The absence of contract value, performance periods, acceptance criteria, or packaging specifications reflects the nature of the transaction as a licensing confirmation tied to land use and environmental compliance, not a procurement with defined deliverables or financial terms.