DUCT, AIR RDU, AIRCRA

The U.S. Defense Logistics Agency awarded Raytheon Company, with CAGE code 54X10, a contract valued at $36,103.35 for the procurement of a single line item: DUCT, AIR RDU, AIRCRA, identified by NSN 1680015699371 and part number PR 7002369078, under solicitation SPE7M0-25-T-4298. The contract was formally awarded on July 13, 2026, following a modification issued on December 12, 2025, and is administered through the DLA Land and Maritime, Maritime Supply Chain office located in Columbus, Ohio. The work is to be performed at Raytheon’s facility in Fairdale, Kentucky, with no alternate delivery locations specified. The contract was executed under simplified acquisition procedures as referenced by FAR 13.302(a) and 12.303(a), consistent with its low dollar value, though the exact contract type such as firm-fixed-price or IDIQ is not explicitly stated. Delivery schedules, quantities, unit pricing, and FOB terms are not detailed in the available documentation, and no options or extensions are indicated. A unique and critical clause incorporated into the contract is FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, under deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, effective as of the award date, requiring Raytheon to comply with federal DEI-related obligations. While the contract includes standard administrative elements such as a point of contact for the contracting officer, Michael Finken, no Contracting Officer’s Representative or technical representative is named. No inspection and acceptance criteria, packaging or marking specifications, quality standards, or technical performance requirements are detailed in the provided documents, and there is no explicit guidance on invoicing methods, payment offices, or accounting data such as TAS or AAC codes. The Unique Entity ID for the contractor is not listed, and no socioeconomic status or small business certifications are identified. Post-award communications and submissions must be processed via the DIBBS portal, and contractors are required to submit post-award requests through this system. The absence of Section J attachments, Section M evaluation factors, and definitive delivery timelines limits visibility into full performance expectations, but the contract is operational under the authority of the standard SF-3