FAIRING, AIRCRAFT

The contract, awarded on July 17, 2026, to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation under solicitation SPE4A5-24-T-034W and issued as a modification to delivery order SPE4A122G0005, encompasses the procurement of an aircraft fairing and associated tooling at a total value of $38,154.38. The work is to be performed at Sikorsky’s facility in Stratford, Connecticut, with no indication of overseas performance. The contract includes two line items: a fairing identified by NSN 1560013404270 valued at $31,957.92 and tooling identified by NSN 0001S00000054 valued at $6,196.46, though specific quantities, units, and delivery schedules are not detailed. The procurement falls under NAICS code 336413, and while the contract type is not explicitly stated, it is administered as a modification under a broader indefinite-delivery vehicle by the Defense Logistics Agency, Aviation Supply Chain, through its office in Richmond, Virginia. Payment and contract administration are overseen by Contracting Officer Dean Allen, with no assigned COR or COTR identified; the remit-to address for payments is not specified, and no accounting codes or invoicing system details are populated. The contract incorporates the mandatory clause FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, effective April 2026 under DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which prohibits discriminatory DEI practices in hiring, promotion, and subcontracting and requires the contractor to report any violations by subcontractors, flow the clause down to applicable subcontracts, and maintain compliance records. Noncompliance may lead to payment withholding, termination, or suspension under 31 U.S.C. 3729(b)(4). The contractor’s CAGE code is 78286, but no size status, socioeconomic certifications, or unique entity ID are stated. No inspection criteria, packaging requirements, quality standards, FOB terms, or technical specifications are detailed in the available data, and while the contract references compliance with FAR and DFARS, no MIL-STDs or other technical standards are cited. The absence of evaluation factors, award rationale