FILTER ELEMENT, FLUI

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE4A726P6523 to JAMAICA BEARINGS CO., INC. (CAGE 04836) on July 21, 2026, for the procurement of a FILTER ELEMENT, FLUI with NSN 1650015035147 at a total value of $336,832.21 under Solicitation SPE4A7-26-T-7042. The contract represents a modification to an original agreement dated March 2, 2026, with an effective date of July 21, 2026. Performance is domestic, with the contractor located in New Hyde Park, New York, though the exact delivery or performance location is not specified. Payment will be processed by DLA Aviation’s ASC Commodities Division in Richmond, Virginia, with Carla Allen as the primary point of contact; the Contracting Officer, Dean Allen, holds full authority over administration and compliance matters. No Contracting Officer’s Representative or Technical Representative is identified in the documentation, and no detailed delivery schedule, FOB terms, or quantity specifications are provided. The sole line item is priced at the full contract amount with no option quantities or ranges indicated. The contract’s most significant requirement is the inclusion of FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, implemented through DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, which prohibits racially discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion practices in recruitment, employment, and contracting. The contractor must comply with this clause across all subcontracts, excluding those performed entirely outside the United States, and is obligated to report any subcontractor violations or legal challenges to the Contracting Officer immediately. Compliance is deemed material to payment under 31 U.S.C. 3729(b)(4), and failure to report or noncompliance may lead to contractual remedies. The contractor is required to maintain records and furnish them upon request, though no detailed inspection criteria, quality standards, packaging, preservation, or labeling specifications are provided. No technical standards such as MIL-STDs are referenced, and no data on accounting codes, invoicing mechanisms, evaluation factors, or socioeconomic status is included. The absence of attachments, section M evaluation criteria, or formal inspection and acceptance protocols suggests that the contract relies heavily on regulatory compliance and administrative reporting rather than technical prescriptive