FLASHLIGHT

The solicitation seeks the supply of a specific flashlight item identified by NSN 6230-01-528-9015 and manufacturer part number PELICAN PRODUCTS INC 65442 P/N 2410-014-245, with a guaranteed minimum quantity of 525 units and a total estimated contract value of $350,000. This procurement is issued as a Request for Quotations under solicitation number SPE4A6-26-R-XB46 by the Defense Logistics Agency, specifically the DLA Aviation ASC Commodities Division, with responses due by close of business on July 27, 2026. The resulting contract will be an Indefinite Delivery Purchase Order with a five-year base period, delivering to various CONUS stock locations, and the items must meet all technical and quality requirements specified in the DLA Master List of Technical and Quality Requirements using 'R' or 'I' designators. The flashlight must be packaged according to DLA’s RP001 standards, marked in compliance with MIL-STD-129 including the fragile designation 01-01, and shipped using the system of record receiving report as the packing list per DFARS Appendix F. Packaging must follow MIL-STD-2073-1E with specific QUP, preservation, and container codes, and hazardous materials must adhere to IP025 standards while ensuring no intentional mercury content except in permitted functional components with secondary containment as required by NAVSEA 5100-003D. All offerors must be eJCP certified, electronically complete and maintain current representations and certifications in SAM, and comply with various applicable FAR and DFARS clauses, including inspection requirements under FAR 52.246-2 and the mandatory use of WAWF for electronic invoicing. Vendors must register in SAM and WAWF, designate a point of contact, and submit proposals via DIBBS or email to David Bailey at david.bailey@dla.mil, with email submissions not exceeding 15 MB. Pricing is evaluated alongside past performance and delivery capability, with past performance being significantly more important than other non-price factors, and award will be made based on best value using a comparative assessment. Conflicting delivery timelines of 100 days ADO and 135 days ARO exist, as do inconsistent FOB terms between origin and destination