GEAR

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded CONTRACT SPE7L525P0785 to LINMARR ASSOCIATES, INC. (CAGE 1GX03) on July 15, 2026, for a total value of $584,955.00 under solicitation SPE7L5-24-Q-0098, for the procurement of GEAR identified by NSN 3020010607067. The contract is a modification to an existing agreement, issued under the authority of FAR 13.302(a) and 12.303(a), with the performance location at the contractor’s facility in Irvine, California. The award was processed through the DIBBS system, and the Contracting Officer, Micheal Finken of DLA Land and Maritime, Land Supply Chain in Columbus, Ohio, is the point of contact for administrative matters. No Contracting Officer’s Representative or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative is identified in the documentation. The contract does not specify detailed delivery schedules, FOB terms, or inspection and acceptance criteria beyond confirming the Government’s authority to accept deliverables, nor are specific packaging, preservation, or marking standards beyond the inclusion of NSN and CAGE codes provided. The contract incorporates FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, under Deviation 2026-00040, which imposes compliance obligations related to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives, requiring the contractor to affirmatively adhere to non-discrimination policies and potentially report on compliance activities. The contractor is required to acknowledge receipt of this amendment via DIBBS, email, mail, or fax, and any post-award issues must be reported using the DIBBS Post Award Request process. No socioeconomic status certifications, small business representations, or unique entity ID are explicitly stated, and the contract type is not disclosed. There are no referenced MIL-STDs for packaging or quality standards, no invoicing method specified, and no accounting or appropriation data provided, though payments will be administered through the DLA Land and Maritime office. The acquisition is presumed to be competitive but the evaluation methodology—whether lowest price technically acceptable or best value—is not documented. While the NSN and contract price are confirmed, detailed line-item pricing, technical specifications, delivery timelines, and performance metrics remain undisclosed in the available documentation.