GLOVE, PATIENT EXAMINING

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Pacific Star Corporation (CAGE 4QNY3) a contract for 10 boxes of patient examining gloves, NSN 6515-01-455-2768, under solicitation SPE2DS-26-T-248F, with a total contract value of $1,079.50 and an award date of July 23, 2026. Delivery is required within 20 days of award, with FOB destination terms dictating that inspection and acceptance occur at the specified delivery point: Fort Irwin, California. The gloves must be packaged and marked in full compliance with Medical Marking Standard No. 1 (MMS No. 1), superseding MIL-STD-129, and packaged according to MIL-STD-2073-1E, ensuring shipment readiness via commercial outer containers and palletization under DLA’s RP001 requirements. No special preservation methods beyond standard coding are mandated, and barcoding is governed by MMS No. 1. The contract incorporates a comprehensive set of Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses covering equal opportunity, trafficking prevention, employment verification, sustainable sourcing, hazardous material identification, cybersecurity safeguarding (including NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS 252.204-7012), subcontractor payment acceleration, contract changes, default provisions, and prohibitions on covered defense telecommunications equipment. The contractor must comply with hazard communication standards (29 CFR 1910.1200) for labeling, and submit hazard warning labels and safety data sheets prior to award if applicable. Payment is to be processed through Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF), with no invoicing via the Invoice Processing Portal permitted. The offeror’s Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE code are required, and socioeconomic status representations—particularly small business or disadvantaged status—must be current in SAM. The contract includes provisions for whistleblower rights, compensation disclosures regarding former DoD officials, and restrictions on mandatory arbitration clauses. All submissions must be made electronically via the DIBBS portal, with no paper proposals accepted, and the technical evaluation criteria are not publicly disclosed.