Grease Traps and Lift Stations Services

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; this is a Request for Proposal (RFP) and a written solicitation will not be issued. The solicitation number is F1T2AZ2054A002-120817 for Grease Traps/Lift Stations Services at Eglin AFB, FL. The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-60 and DFARS Publication Notice 20120724. The associated NAICS code is 562998 with a Small Business Size Standard of $7 million. This solicitation is totally set-aside for small business concerns eligible under the small business program. Refer to FAR 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside. This clause may be accessed via the internet at http://farsite.hill.af.mil . Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this combined Synopsis/solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, whether before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs. Description of Requirement: Refer to Attachment 1, Performance Work Statement (PWS). Period of Performance: 1 October 2012 through 30 September 2013 and four one-year option periods, if the option periods are exercised. Deadline for Receipt of Offers: 14 September 2012, 1:00 PM, Central Standard Time (CST). Wage Determination 2005-3033, Revision 12, dated 13 June 2012 will be incorporated in the contract. The following provisions apply to this acquisition and may be accessed via the internet at http://farsite.hill.af.mil : FAR 52-212-1 Instructions to Offerors is incorporated by reference. FAR 52-212-1 Instructions to Offerors - Addendum INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS I. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications and Performance Work Statement requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Volume I - Price Proposal, Volume II - Past Performance Information, and Volume III - Past Performance References. You must submit an original and one (1) paper copy. Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions fully and carefully, as the Government intends to make an award based on the initial offers received, without discussion of such offers. In proposal volumes, follow the quantity and page limits as follows: Section, Copies and Page Limits Volume I - Price Proposal (Bid Schedule) Original + (1) copy No page limit Volume II - Past Performance Information Original + (1) copy 10 pages (*) Volume III - (Appendix A) Past Performance References Original + (1) copy No page limit (**) (Appendix B) Completed Past Performance Questionnaires Original + (1) copy No page limit (**) NOTES: * If the offeror is utilizing significant subcontractors, a total of ten (10) additional pages are authorized for all subcontractors past performance information. ** Provide the form at Appendix A of not more than five (5) references of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years as part of the Past Performance Volume III. If the offeror is utilizing significant subcontractors, in addition to the five (5) references for the prime, the offeror may provide five (5) additional references for each significant subcontractor. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will NOT be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. In addition, the offeror is responsible for providing the Government the completed Appendix B questionnaires provided back to the offeror by their references as part of the Past Performance of Volume III. The paper files will be checked to determine the number of pages and compliance with proposal instructions. Those pages in excess of the limit will be removed from the back of the Volume II and returned by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) to ensure they are not evaluated. The Government will not keep any pages in excess of the limit. If Evaluation Notices (EN's) are required, page limits may be placed on any responses. Any page limits for responses to ENs will be identified in the letter forwarding the ENs to you. Excess pages submitted in response to EN's will also be removed in the same manner by the PCO. B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price. In accordance with FAR 15.403-1(b) and 15.403-3(a), data other than cost or pricing data may be required to support price reasonableness and realism. Data shall be provided in accordance with FAR 15.403-5. If, after receipt of proposals, the CO determines that there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1 apply, the Offeror shall be required to submit certified cost or pricing data. Should adequate price competition not exist after receipt of proposals, the provisions of FAR Part 15.403-4 shall apply, and the Offeror will be asked to provide certification of cost or pricing data. C. Specific Instructions: 1. Volume I - PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit Original Proposal and One (1) Copy (a) Insert proposed price on the bid schedule (Attachment 2) for base year and four (4) option years. A breakout of Grease Traps/Lift Stations can be located on Appendix A of the attached Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1). (b) Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm until 31 December 2012. 2. Volume II -PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL - Submit Original Proposal and One (1) Copy Only information for same or similar type contracts is desired. Provide any information currently available (i.e. descriptive language, letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed projects for same or similar type contracts completed in the last three years. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc. Provide comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. If applicable, provide a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have recent and relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will NOT be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. 3. Volume III -PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCES - Submit Original Proposal and One (1) Copy. (a) Only references for same or similar type contracts are desired. (b) The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed recent and relevant to the requirements of this RFP. The Government will use information submitted by the offeror on the Appendix A and Appendix B forms, the Past Performance Proposal and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Recent and relevant contracts include contracts that meet the recent and relevancy definition cited below. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have recent and relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition; however, past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have recent and relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will NOT be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. RECENT AND RELEVANT INFORMATION For the purpose of this solicitation, Recent and Relevant Past Performance is defined as: 1. RECENT - Ongoing contracts with a performance history, and contracts completed within three (3) years from the issue date of this Combined Synopsis/Solicitation posting. 2. RELEVANT -Performance of work which is the same or similar in scope, trade, and complexity, as described in the combined synopsis/solicitation, including contract type, contract environment, subcontractor interaction, and price. The Government may also use other information available to it that is determined relevant to this effort, such as, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Teaming Arrangement or Joint Venture: If the offeror intends to fulfill the requirements of this solicitation in a teaming arrangement or joint venture, the offeror must provide complete information as to the arrangement, including a list of any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements or joint ventures with the same teaming or joint venture partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present contracts. Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor's consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN, INSTRUCTIONS AND EVALUATION Your attention is directed to the functional relationship between Instructions to Offers and Evaluation of Offers. Instructions provide information for the purpose of organizing the proposal and are not intended to be all-inclusive. Evaluation of Offers describes evaluation factors for award, to include the evaluation procedures for responsiveness to the combined synopsis/solicitation, ranking of the Price proposal and the assessment of Past Performance information. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THIS PROVISION RISK REJECTION. 3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this Clause will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal (in a manner previously described in paragraph A of this contract clause). 4. Format for all proposal Volumes shall be as follows: (a) Proposals shall be neat, indexed (cross-indexed as appropriate) and assembled in an orderly manner. (b) Page Set-Up/Font Size/Lines on Page. Only 8 - x 11 inch, portrait format pages are acceptable for text-oriented material. Landscape (8 - x 11 inch) pages are permitted for charts or graphs. Foldout pages are limited to 11 x 17 inch and may be portrait or landscape (limit 5). Text font must be Times New Roman (with no "narrow" font versions acceptable). Font size must be 12 point with proportional spacing permitted. Type size for figures and tables must be no smaller than 8-point with proportional spacing permitted. Text may be wrapped around figures and tables. Margins on all four (4) edges of each page will be at least 1 inch. Include: RFP number, Volume and/or subdirectory title and page number in the margin on the upper right of all pages. Single spacing may be used for figures and tables. Company name and proprietary information notices must be placed on top and/or bottom margins. Use single column formatting only; multi-column formatting is not allowed. Graphics are allowed in either color or B & W with an 8-point minimum on embedded text except where data is only being used as a sample and readability is not intended. Proposals must not be supplemented by a package or supplemented by reference documents. Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required. (c) Page Definition. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. (d) Page Numbering. Pages in each volume must be numbered sequentially and consecutively. The cover page, table of contents, list(s) of tables and drawings, and blank pages are excluded from the page count. (e) It is preferred that the volumes are not submitted in hard cover binders. E. Deviations. Deviations from these instructions will be reviewed by the Contracting Officer to ensure that no contractor receives a competitive advantage. Deviations resulting in a competitive advantage for an offeror will result in the proposal being determined noncompliant with the RFP requirements. Offerors unconditionally assume the risk that a clear quantitative deviation will be deemed qualitatively advantageous to the offeror and determined noncompliant with the RFP. F. Disposition of Unsuccessful Proposals. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requires otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of unsuccessful proposals. G. Proposal Delivery. Offerors are advised that delays can be experienced entering the installation when proposals are hand carried to the base. See below instructions for specific requirements to access this installation. In addition to the specific instructions below vehicle registration, proof of insurance and proper identification is required to enter the installation. Proposals must emailed to lesa.white@eglin.af.mil (primary) or david.serbe@eglin.af.mil (alternate) - OR be hand delivered or mailed to arrive at the following address by the required dates: AFTC/PZIOA ATTN: Lesa White 308 WEST D AVENUE, BUILDING 260, SUITE 130 EGLIN AFB FL 32542 Base passes are required to enter Eglin AFB. Each person requesting a base pass must provide a completed Request for Base Access Memo and Affidavit to this office (AFTC/PZIOA) at least three business-days prior to the date needing access this installation. The Request for Base Access Memo and Affidavit are Attachments 5 and 6 of this solicitation. These documents shall be sent to lesa.white@eglin.af.mil (primary) or david.serbe@eglin.af.mil (alternate). Affidavits that are emailed must contain only one (1) affidavit and one Request for Base Access Memo attached per email. When submitting multiple affidavits each affidavit must be a separate file attachment to the email along with the Request for Base Access Memo. Do not exceed the email file size of 10 MB or the email may not be received. The email subject line and document must read "FOUO LAST NAME, FIRST NAME". (Name is of the person identified in the Affidavit). Or you may send the affidavit and Request for Base Access Memo via U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier to: AFTC/PZIOA ATTN: Lesa White 308 WEST D AVENUE, BUILDING 260, SUITE 130 EGLIN AFB FL 32542 Anticipate a lead time of three business-days for Security Forces to process the documents and conduct the required background check. The prime contractor can provide paperwork for their subcontractor(s). When reporting to the East Gate (Valparaiso) Visitor's Center, the authorized contractor individual(s) should provide a valid driver's license, current vehicle registration, valid vehicle insurance certificate and social security card to obtain a vehicle pass. HAND-CARRIED proposals may be deposited in the bid repository located in Building 260, outside Room 130, Eglin AFB, FL. The envelope used in submitting your proposal must be plainly marked with the solicitation number, and the date and local time set for proposal closing. NOTE: It is imperative that a contractor intending to deliver their proposal by commercial carrier, e.g. Federal Express, DHL, UPS, etc., insure that the outer envelope of the commercial carrier's package identifies the contents as a proposal. This outer package must clearly show the solicitation number and the date and local time set for proposal closing. H. Electronic Reference Documents. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. I. Formal Communications: Offerors should submit formal communications such as requests for clarifications and/or information concerning this solicitation by e-mail to the following address NO LATER THAN 4:00 p.m. CST on 5 September 2012: ATTN: Lesa White 308 WEST D AVENUE, BUILDING 260, SUITE 130 EGLIN AFB FL 32542 Email: Lesa.White@eglin.af.mil 52.212-2 - Evaluation - Commercial Items - Addendum EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS I. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD A. This is a competitive Best Value acquisition using the Tradeoff Process, without technical proposals, with Past Performance being approximately equal to Price. This procurement will be conducted as a Total Small Business Set-Aside for small business concerns eligible under the small business program. The Government will award a contract resulting from the solicitation to the acceptable, responsible Small Business offeror whose proposal conforming to this solicitation offers the Best Value to the Government, with Past Performance being approximately equal to Price. Evaluation criteria are the same for all competing offerors. B. Offerors shall propose on all items. Any offer that fails to cite a price for each item or fails to make an entry that indicates service will be provided at no charge may be rejected as nonconforming to this solicitation. C. Only Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) offers will be evaluated. An offer using a sliding price scale or subject to escalation based on any contingency will not be accepted. D. The evaluation process will proceed as follows: 1. Price: Initially, offers will be ranked according to Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The price evaluation will be made on the basis of the total price of all line items including the corresponding CLINs under Options. An offeror must therefore propose on all line items including the options. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness based on prices submitted from competitive proposals, current market conditions, and comparison to the Government estimate. Prices will also be evaluated to determine if they are materially unbalanced. Materially unbalanced prices risk rejection. 2. Past Performance: Using the information provided in the Past Performance Reference Information (Appendix A), completed Past Performance Questionnaires (Appendix B) and other available information, the contracting officer shall seek recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on the past efforts provided by the offeror and data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. (a) Recent and Relevant Information: For the purpose of this combined synopsis/solicitation, Recent and Relevant Past Performance is defined as: (1) Recent - Ongoing contracts with a performance history and contracts completed within three (3) years from the issue date of this solicitation. (2) Relevant - Performance of work efforts involving Grease Traps/Lift Stations services and management that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation and performance work statement. (b) The Government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receive a Substantial Confidence performance confidence assessment. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the government to assess the offeror's ability to perform the effort described in this RFP, based on the offeror's demonstrated past performance. The Government will conduct a performance confidence assessment based upon past performance of the offerors as it relates to the probability of successfully performing the solicitation requirements. This evaluation will include the contractor's record of: (A) conforming to the Performance Work Statement and contract requirements, (B) management of work, (C) reasonable, cooperative behavior, performance and commitment to customer satisfaction and (D) quality control. This assessment represents the government evaluation team's judgment of the probability of an offeror successfully accomplishing the proposed effort, based upon the offeror's demonstrated past performance. The rating may be determined initially or as a result of discussions. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence. (c) Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the offeror's performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating "Unknown Confidence," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Definitions for Performance Confidence Assessments and Relevancy are as defined below: Performance Confidence Assessments Substantial Confidence - Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence - Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Limited Confidence - Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence - Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, The Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Unknown Confidence (Neutral) - No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Definitions Very Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Somewhat Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities than this solicitation requires. Not Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. (d) In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this RFP. E. Best Value Determination: Offerors will be initially ranked from lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) to the highest TEP. 1. If the lowest TEP is determined to be reasonable, and is judged to have an overall Substantial confidence performance rating, that offer represents the Best Value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award will be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. 2. IF THE LOWEST TEP OFFER IS NOT JUDGED TO HAVE AN OVERALL SUBSTAINIAL CONFIDENCE PEFORMANCE RATING THE EVALUATION WILL CONTINUE AS FOLLOWS: (a) If the lowest TEP acceptable offer is reasonable, but does not have a confidence rating of Substantial Confidence, the next lowest TEP, acceptable offer will be evaluated and the process will continue until an offeror whose price is reasonable receives a confidence rating of Substantial Confidence overall for past performance. (b) The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment Best Value award decision by determining if the Best Value to the Government is to pay a higher cost for a higher past performance assessment rating. The Government reserves the following rights: (1) To award a contract to the lowest TEP offeror who has Substantial Confidence Rating; (2) To award to higher TEP offeror who has Substantial Confidence Rating; (3) To award a contract to the lowest TEP offeror who has at least a Satisfactory Confidence Rating. 3. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in FAR 52.212-1. Offeror's may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of present and past performance information) or respond to adverse present/past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision. 4. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. 5. Rejection of Unrealistic Offers: The Government may reject any proposal that is assessed to be unrealistic in terms of contract requirements, including contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low in cost, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect lack of competence or failure to comprehend the scope of the requirement. Proposals that are unrealistic in terms of price may be rejected at any time during the evaluation process. Proposals are intended to be evaluated, and award made, without discussions with the offerors (other than minor clarification[s]), unless discussions are determined to be necessary. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. Offerors may be required to participate in telephone discussions or in face-to-face oral discussions at the Operational Contracting Division, 308 West "D" Avenue, Suite 130, Bldg 260, Eglin AFB FL. Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions fully and carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial offers received, without discussion of such offers. The offeror's initial proposal should reflect their best effort. (End of Provision) The provision at FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items, applies to this solicitation and the offeror must include a completed copy of this provision with their proposal. The following provisions apply to this acquisition and will be incorporated by full text. These provisions may be accessed via the internet at http://farsite.hill.af.mil : FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items FAR 52.219-1 Small Business Program Representations FAR 52.222-22 Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports FAR 52.252.1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference The following clauses apply to this acquisition and will be incorporated by reference. These clauses may be accessed via the internet at http://farsite.hill.af.mil : FAR 52.202-1 Definitions FAR 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper FAR 52.204-7 Central Contractor Registration FAR 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions - Commercial Items FAR 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services FAR 52.228-5 Insurance - Work on a Government Installation FAR 52.237-2 Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment and Vegetation FAR 52.247-34 FOB Destination FAR 52.249-4 Termination for Convenience of the Government FAR 52.249-8 Default FAR 52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms DFARS 252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights DFARS 252.204-7004 Alternate A, Central Contractor Registration DFARS 252.209-7999 Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony conviction under any Federal Law. DFARS 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DFARS 252.243-7001 Pricing of Contract Modifications The following clauses apply to this acquisition and will be incorporated by full text. These clauses may be accessed via the internet at http://farsite.hill.af.mil: FAR 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders -- Commercial Items. The following are additional FAR clauses applicable under this clause, 52.212-5: 52.203-6 Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government 52.209-6 Protecting the Government' Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment 52.219-6 Notice of Total Small Business Aside 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns 52.219-28 Post Award Small Business Program Representation 52.222-3 Convict Labor 52.222-19 Child Labor-Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies 52.222-21 Prohibition of Segregated Facilities 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity 52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans 52.222-36 Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons 52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging while Driving 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-Central Contractor Registration 52.222-41 Service Contract Act of 1965 52.222-42 Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires FAR 52.217-9 Option to Extend the Term of the Contract FAR 52.232-19 Availability of funds for the Next fiscal Year FAR 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated by Reference FAR 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses DFARS 252.212-7001 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statues or Executive Orders Applicable to Defense Acquisitions of Commercial Items. The following are additional FAR clauses applicable under this clause, DFARS 252.212-7001: 52.203-3 Gratuities 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials 252.225-7012 Preference for Certain Domestic Commodities 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests 252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor Personnel 252.243-7001 Pricing of Contract Modifications 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment 252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea AFARS 5352.201-9101 Ombudsman AFARS 5352.223-9001 Health and Safety on Government Installations AFARS 5352.242-9000 Contractor Access to Air Force Installations All propo...