GREASE, UTILITY

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a firm-fixed-price delivery order under contract SPE4AX16D9008 to ASRC Federal Facilities Logistics, LLC, with a CAGE code of 79343, for the supply of one container of Utility Grease (NSN 9150006631770) at a total price of $80.17. The award was issued on July 21, 2026, and delivery is required by August 5, 2026, to Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, under FOB destination terms, meaning the contractor bears all costs and risks until the item is received at the destination. The shipment must be sent via the fastest traceable means, excluding parcel post, and must be properly marked with the transaction control number W8005Q62020059, receiving distribution destination 777, support activity designator W9046W, and signature code C. The contract incorporates by reference the terms and conditions of the basic contract, including DFARS 252.232-7003 for electronic invoicing through the DoD’s payment system, with payment to be processed through the Defense Finance and Accounting Service at P.O. Box 182317, Columbus, OH 43218-2317 under accounting code BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2624 S33189. The awardee is certified as a small business with claims for Small Disadvantaged Business and Women-Owned Small Business status, triggering compliance obligations under FAR and DFARS regulations concerning small business program representation and limitations on subcontracting. The delivery order is designated as a rated order under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS), requiring adherence to priority handling and capacity reporting requirements. Inspection and acceptance will occur at the destination by the Government, with acceptance contingent upon conformity to the contract specifications without additional technical standards explicitly cited. Administrative oversight is managed by DLA Aviation, with Holly Dunganan as the administrative contact and Amanda Parker as the signatory. No special requirements such as security clearances, key personnel, options, or organizational conflict of interest provisions are included. The procurement, valued at less than $100, was likely made using a Low Price Technically Acceptable approach consistent with routine DLA