HEAD, LINEAR ACTUATI

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE4A726P7462 to CAPY MACHINE SHOP INC. (CAGE 0BVP9) on July 21, 2026, for a total value of $16,976.00 under Solicitation SPE4A7-26-T-6218. The contract scope centers on the production and testing of a linear actuator component identified by National Stock Number 1650001875191, alongside mandatory Contractor First Article Testing and Production Lot Testing. Performance is to occur at the contractor’s facility located at 114 Spagnoli Rd, Melville, NY 11747-3502, with delivery and inspection governed by federal acquisition protocols. The contracting officer is Dean Allen of DLA Aviation in Richmond, VA, and the contract administration involves standard government oversight, though no Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative is designated. While the contract structure suggests a Firm-Fixed-Price arrangement, formal classification is not explicitly stated, and no quantities, unit prices, or delivery schedules are provided beyond the total award amount. This contract incorporates FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, as implemented under DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, introducing unique compliance obligations beyond typical defense procurement. The contractor is prohibited from engaging in racially discriminatory DEI practices and must flow down this requirement to all subcontracts, report any subcontractor violations or legal challenges, and supply records upon request. Noncompliance may result in contract termination for default. The NAICS code 332710 applies, classifying the business as a machine shop, but no socioeconomic status certifications or small business size representations are included. Packaging, preservation, labeling, and technical specification standards are not detailed in the documentation, though traceability through NSN and contract number is implied. Invoicing methods and payment offices are not explicitly defined, though the DLA Aviation office in Richmond is identified as the issuing authority. No evaluation factors, inspection criteria, or quality standards are specified beyond the required testing milestones, and there is no indication of options, modifications beyond the issued amendment, or overseas performance. The contract reflects a small-dollar, technically focused award with stringent administrative and compliance requirements rooted in recent federal directives concerning DEI.