Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

Homes England - Property, Financial and Development Services Framework- Worcestershire Parkway - lot 1

Awarded
DN826830International

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

AI Contract Overview

Show more

This contract, awarded to Montagu Evans LLP by Homes England, provides strategic infrastructure and non-residential land valuation services for the Worcestershire Parkway project. Valued at 60,000 pounds excluding VAT, the engagement runs from October 6, 2026, to August 19, 2027. The scope is divided into two primary services: the creation of a comprehensive valuation framework for strategic infrastructure and non-residential land, and a specific shared value assessment regarding Network Rail. The first service involves developing a detailed valuation methodology for large consortium developments, covering various asset types such as education, healthcare, transport, and green infrastructure. This includes establishing principles for value attribution, creating decision trees for methodology selection, and providing guidance on treating costs, obligations, and multi-landowner consortium complexities. The second service applies this framework to a case study at Wychavon Town to assess shared value with Network Rail, involving the evaluation of land values, asset interventions, and potential offsets to provide an independent commercial opinion for negotiations.

General Info

Montagu Evans LLP provides land valuation services for Worcestershire Parkway from 2026 to 2027.

Contract Value

$0

NAICS

N/A

Place of Performance

GBR

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

1
PDF, Low priorityaward
Low

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

Contract not broken down yet

CLEATUS splits the solicitation into Uniform Contract Format (UCF) sections: scope, pricing, deliverables, and evaluation criteria.

Timeline

PhaseAwarded
Posted

Award Notice

Awarded

Contract was awarded

Ready to pursue this opportunity?

Get full access to track this contract, build proposals with AI assistance, and manage your pipeline.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyHomes England (the name adopted by the Homes and Communities Agency)
Contacts1 person available
OfficeN/A

Full Description

Show more
Service 1 – Strategic Infrastructure and Non-Residential Land Valuation Framework Workstream 1 – Inception, Information Review and Project Management • Attend one inception meeting of up to two hours within one week of appointment. • Review the project information made available by Homes England, including masterplans, planning and development assumptions, infrastructure and transport strategies, programme information, consortium arrangements, land ownership information, relevant legal agreements, cost estimates, viability and financial modelling and Network Rail correspondence. • Prepare an Information Requirements Schedule identifying information required, its purpose, owner, priority and any implications if unavailable. • Confirm the proposed methodology, programme, deliverables, review process and reporting arrangements in an inception note. • Maintain an issues, assumptions and decisions log throughout the commission. • Attend up to two progress meetings of up to one hour each in addition to the specific meetings identified below. Workstream 2 – Valuation Principles and Methodology • Develop a valuation methodology for strategic infrastructure and non-residential land uses on large consortium developments. • Consider appropriate approaches to existing use value, market value, development value, residual value, land value uplift, opportunity cost and value sharing. • Explain when each approach should be used, the evidence required, key assumptions, limitations and circumstances in which an alternative approach is necessary. • Establish principles for value attribution, proportionality, infrastructure dependency, public and private investment, commercial reasonableness and market practice. • Address the interaction between residential development value and land required for non-residential uses. • Provide a clear decision tree or process map showing how Homes England should select and apply the appropriate methodology. Workstream 3 – Asset-Type Application Guidance The framework shall include specific guidance for the following asset types, identifying the recommended valuation basis, evidence requirements, key adjustments and principal risks for each: • education land; • healthcare land and facilities; • public open space and community parks; • strategic green infrastructure; • community and cultural facilities; • emergency services land; • transport and rail infrastructure; • utilities and service infrastructure; and • other public-sector or enabling land uses. The Consultant shall identify which principles are common across all asset types and where materially different approaches are required. Workstream 4 – Costs, Obligations and Adjustments • Establish how strategic infrastructure costs, abnormal costs, mitigation, legal obligations, land assembly costs, programme impacts and delivery risk should be treated in valuation assessments. • Distinguish between costs that affect gross value, costs that may properly offset value uplift and costs that should be treated elsewhere in a development appraisal. • Address the treatment of timing, indexation, risk, contingency, phasing and double counting. • Provide worked examples or illustrative calculations sufficient to demonstrate application of the methodology. Workstream 5 – Consortium and Multi-Landowner Considerations • Advise on appropriate common assumptions where commercially sensitive information cannot be shared between developers. • Address differing developer appraisals, landowner positions, collaboration arrangements and governance structures. • Identify implications arising from Competition and Markets Authority considerations and data confidentiality. • Recommend practical governance, evidence and assurance arrangements to support consistent application of the methodology across a consortium. Service 2 – Network Rail Shared Value Assessment Workstream 6 – Network Rail Case Study and Valuation • Apply the recommended framework to the current Network Rail Shared Value discussions at Wychavon Town. • Assess the relevant existing land value and development value positions using available evidence. • Identify the extent to which value is attributable to Network Rail land, assets, rights or interventions. • Assess potential gross and net Shared Value and provide a reasoned value or range of values. • Identify the asset interventions and legal or operational dependencies that materially affect the assessment. • Provide sensitivity testing against the assumptions most likely to affect the outcome. • Clearly distinguish facts, assumptions, professional judgement and areas where further evidence is required. • Provide an independent opinion on the likely commercial position and recommendations for Homes England’s negotiations with Network Rail. Workstream 7 – Network Rail Costs and Offsets The assessment shall identify and evaluate costs and deductions that may be relevant to any net Shared Value position, including where applicable: • strategic infrastructure costs; • rail enhancement and Network Rail asset works; • asset protection costs; • bridges, crossings and access arrangements; • operational railway land, permanent acquisition and temporary possession; • drainage, easements and statutory undertaker requirements; • abnormal development costs; • highways, utilities and environmental mitigation; • legal obligations, land assembly and programme impacts; and • any other relevant costs or benefits. The Consultant shall explain the basis on which each item is included or excluded, how it affects the assessment and how double counting is avoided. Workstream 8 – Existing Models and Assurance • Review existing financial modelling and viability work only to the extent necessary to ensure consistency of assumptions and avoid duplication. • Identify and explain material inconsistencies between the valuation assessment and other project models. • Set out an audit trail of source information, assumptions, adjustments and calculations. • Provide a proportionate quality assurance statement confirming the internal review undertaken by a suitably experienced senior valuer.

Ready to Pursue This Opportunity?

Get AI-powered intelligence on this solicitation and the ones like it

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS