ICEMAKER-DISPENSER

JAL ENTERPRISES, INC. (CAGE 0SG78) has been awarded a delivery order under the indefinite-delivery contract SPE3SE26D5019 from the Defense Logistics Agency for one ice maker-dispenser unit (NSN 4110014080231) at a total price of $9,972.40, with delivery scheduled for October 13, 2026. The contract is classified as an indefinite-delivery contract under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, with a guaranteed minimum value of $35,000 and a maximum aggregate value of $350,000 over its lifetime, though only one line item is currently specified. The item is to be delivered FOB destination to a U.S. military facility in Silverdale, Washington, with the contractor bearing all costs and risks until delivery is completed. Compliance with rigorous military packaging and marking standards is mandatory, including MIL-STD-2073-1E for preservation and packaging, MIL-STD-129 for shipment labeling, and MIL-STD-130 for unique item identification using 2D Data Matrix symbols encoded per ISO/IEC 16022 and ANSI MH10.8.2. The unit must also meet requirements for traceability, with UUI data submitted via WAWF or DD Form 1423. The contractor is a small disadvantaged, woman-owned business, and the contract includes mandatory flow-down clauses regarding cybersecurity (NIST SP 800-171 revision 2), cyber incident reporting, subcontractor compliance, ocean transportation certification, antiterrorism training, and whistleblower protections. Acceptance is performed by the government at the destination, and payment must be processed electronically through WAWF using specified invoice types. Contracting officer John Golden is listed as the official point of contact, though no Contracting Officer’s Representative has been named. The clause structure includes deviations and alternatives such as Alternate I to 52.240-91 and Deviation 2026-00015 for 252.244-7999, indicating tailored regulatory compliance. No attachments are listed in the documentation, despite references to embedded software or special tooling requirements, and the pricing for the single line item contains an apparent inconsistency between unit and extended price values, though the official contract limits supersede this