INDICATOR, SIGHT, LIQ

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded JA MOODY LLC, with CAGE code 3B558, a contract valued at $6,836.00 for the procurement of two units of the item INDICATOR, SIGHT, LIQ, identified by NSN 6680015731692, under solicitation SPE4A6-26-T-71B5, with an award date of July 22, 2026. Delivery is required 254 days after the delivery order, to the designated location in Tracy, California, with FOB Origin terms, meaning title and risk of loss transfer to the government upon delivery to the carrier at the contractor’s origin. Packaging must conform to MIL-STD-2073-1E and DLA RP001, with preservation method code 10 (dry/clean), wrap material of paper, unit container as a commercial box, and all marking compliant with MIL-STD-129, which includes barcoding, hazardous material labeling, and exclusion of mercury or mercury-containing compounds. The contract includes multiple Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses addressing compliance with equal opportunity for workers with disabilities, combating human trafficking, employment eligibility verification, sustainable procurement, hazardous material identification, copyright authorization, and cybersecurity requirements under NIST SP 800-171, each with specific deviations or alternate versions applied. Transportation of supplies by sea requires defined terms regarding foreign-flag vessels, and subcontracting for commercial products must adhere to specified deviation protocols. Inspection and acceptance occur at origin, with quality assurance governed by MIL-STD-1916 and either SAE AS9003 or ISO 9001, requiring zero non-conformances in sampled lots unless otherwise stated. Hazardous materials must be labeled per OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard, with Safety Data Sheets and warning labels submitted prior to award, and updates required if material composition changes. The contractor must use Wide Area WorkFlow for invoicing, and payment instructions are to be obtained through the DD Form 1155. Representations regarding small business status, socioeconomic certifications, and disclosure of covered defense telecommunications equipment are required but not yet completed in the contract. The contract does not define a formal contract type or pricing justification beyond the total award amount, suggesting a micro-purchase or simplified acquisition approach, and no formal evaluation factors, weights, or risk ratings are provided, indicating a price-driven award process. All activities must align