INDICATOR, SIGHT, LIQ

The contract awarded to Johnson Controls Navy Systems, LLC under solicitation SPE4A5-26-T-134E is a simplified acquisition for 21 units of an Indicator, Sight, Liquid (NSN 6680015197715) at a unit price of $21.000, resulting in a total contract value of $441.00. The award was issued on July 29, 2026, with delivery required 171 days after order placement, with the need ship date set for November 8, 2026, and final delivery completion no later than March 22, 2027. Delivery is FOB origin to a designated warehouse at 25600 S Chrisman Road, Tracy, CA 95304-5000, where government inspection and acceptance will occur. Packaging and marking must strictly adhere to MIL-STD-2073-1E for preservation and MIL-STD-129 for labeling, including special “Fragile” markings and compliance with hazard communication standards under 29 CFR 1910.1200 for any hazardous materials. Bar-coding is mandatory per MIL-STD-129, and items with radioactive content exceeding specified thresholds must be clearly identified accordingly. Invoicing must be submitted exclusively through WAWF, with payment processing managed via DoDAAC codes. The contract incorporates a comprehensive set of FAR and DFARS clauses covering cybersecurity safeguards including 252.204-7012 and 252.204-7020 requiring NIST SP 800-171 compliance, whistleblower protections, employment eligibility verification, combating human trafficking, and prohibitions on covered telecommunications equipment. The solicitation did not specify a contract type in its initial posting, though the nature of the acquisition suggests a firm-fixed-price structure. All offerors were required to maintain current SAM registration with accurate UEI and CAGE codes and to complete applicable representations regarding small business status and socioeconomic certifications. Though the initial solicitation referenced optional contract types under FAR 52.216-1 and its alternate, the awarded contract reflects a straightforward purchase with no options, indefinite quantities, or performance-based payment structures. No attachments were listed in Section J, and no evaluation factors beyond compliance were explicitly defined, implying the award was likely based