58--LENS ASSEMBLY,FOCUS

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a fixed-price contract valued at $314,798.40 to A.G.H. INDUSTRIES, LLC (CAGE 50888) on July 17, 2026, under solicitation SPE4A7-26-T-2001, for the supply of a LENS ASSEMBLY, FOCUS identified by NSN 5855015194171. The contract was issued as a modification to an original agreement dated December 2, 2025, and is administratively managed by DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia, with payments processed through the designated paying office. The awardee is located in Euless, Texas, and the performance and delivery are expected to occur within the United States, though no explicit delivery schedule, FOB terms, or quantity details are provided in the available documentation. The contract encompasses a single line item with no option quantities specified, and while the total value is clearly stated, unit pricing and quantity breakpoints are not delineated. A critical and distinguishing feature of this contract is the inclusion of FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, as implemented under DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1. This clause imposes mandatory compliance obligations on the contractor, requiring the prohibition of racially discriminatory DEI practices in employment, subcontracting, and program participation, along with the flowdown of these requirements to all subcontracts performed within the United States. The contractor must maintain records accessible for federal audits, promptly report any subcontractor violations, and notify the Contracting Officer if legal challenges arise against the clause. Noncompliance may result in contract termination, suspension of work, or debarment, and adherence is deemed material to payment. No other special requirements such as security clearances, key personnel designations, or OCI provisions are included. While the contract references federal acquisition regulations and includes administrative identifiers like the agency code 97AS and Standard Form 30, it lacks detailed specifications for packaging, inspection, acceptance criteria, or quality standards, and does not list applicable military or industry specifications. The basis of award is not explicitly stated, but the absence of evaluation factors and the fixed-price nature suggest a possible LPTA approach. No attachments, technical data packages, or formal statement of work are included in the available documentation, and the contractor’s