LIGHT, INDICATOR

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a firm fixed-price contract to KAMPI COMPONENTS CO INC (CAGE 7Z016) for the procurement of a single line item: LIGHT, INDICATOR (NSN 6210011845041), with a total contract value of $32,397.92. The award, issued under solicitation SPE4A6-26-T-517S and contract modification P00001, was executed on July 21, 2026, with performance to be delivered from the contractor’s facility in Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania. The contract is administered by DLA Aviation at 6090 Strathmore Road, Richmond, Virginia, with Dean Allen serving as the Contracting Officer and reachable via CARL.ALLEN@DLA.MIL. Notably, no Contracting Officer’s Representative or technical point of contact is identified in the documentation. The contract does not specify delivery schedules, FOB terms, quantity details, or unit pricing beyond the total amount, indicating a straightforward, low-value procurement aligned with Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology. The only contractual clause incorporated is FAR 52.222-90, addressing DEI discrimination by federal contractors, stemming from Executive Orders 14275, 14265, and 14398 and OMB M-25-26. This clause imposes affirmative obligations on the contractor to report compliance information, flow down the clause to subcontracts (except those performed outside the U.S.), and notify the government of any subcontractor violations or litigation tied to DEI compliance. No technical specifications, quality standards, packaging requirements, MIL-STD references, or inspection criteria beyond administrative compliance are detailed. The acceptability of the deliverable is tied to adherence to this regulatory clause and the return of the executed Standard Form 30, with final acceptance presumed to occur at the government’s contracting office in Richmond, Virginia. Invoicing methods, payment details, accounting codes, and electronic systems like WAWF are not specified, while no socioeconomic certifications, size status, or additional representations beyond the DEI clause are provided. The absence of Section M evaluation factors and Section J attachments reinforces that this was a non-competitive, direct award for a standard commercial item governed primarily by regulatory compliance rather than performance or technical evaluation.