LIMITED SOURCES JUSTIFICATION for CMa Services - Capital Security Program and Courts Construction Project, Alexandria, LA

This contract action represents a sole-source award of Construction Manager as Advisor (CMa) services under a National Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for the Capital Security Program and Courts Construction Project in Alexandria, Louisiana, justified under unusual urgency and unique specialization due to an existing Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI). The procurement is managed by the General Services Administration’s Public Buildings Service, with the contracting office located in Fort Worth, Texas, and performance required at the courthouse construction site in Alexandria, LA. The award was made to Procon Consulting, LLC based on its irreplaceable two-year institutional knowledge of the project’s design evolution and critical role in ensuring uninterrupted oversight during the 65% complete construction phase, where transitioning to a new provider would introduce a three-month onboarding delay and pose unacceptable risks to safety, quality, and schedule. The justification for non-competitive procurement aligns with GSAM 538.7104-3(b) and FAR 9.504, ensuring mitigation of OCI by separating CMa functions from the Architect-Engineer contract, and the award is framed as delivering best value to the government through cost-neutral reallocation of funds from the descope of CMa services in the original design contract, with discounts applied under FAR 8.405-4. The period of performance is estimated at 365 calendar days, with all inspections and acceptance activities occurring on-site in accordance with the U.S. Courts Design Guide and U.S. Marshals Service Publication 64, and administrative oversight is conducted by the GSA Contracting Officer and Contracting Officer’s Representative in Fort Worth, though specific names and contact details for these roles are not disclosed. No formal contract clauses, evaluation factors, pricing line items, or socioeconomic certifications are provided, as the action is driven by existing BPA authority and the urgency of maintaining continuity in a high-risk construction environment, with the sole justification document and redacted LSJ as the primary basis for award.