LUBRICANT ANTISEIZE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under the base contract SPE4AX-16-D-9012 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC, with a CAGE code of 79343, for the procurement of five pounds of lubricant antisize, identified by NSN 6850010445034, at a unit price of $13.23, resulting in a total contract value of $66.15. The order was issued on July 18, 2026, with a delivery deadline of September 16, 2026, and is designated as a rated order under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (15 CFR 700), indicating national defense priority status. The item is to be shipped FOB origin from the contractor’s location in Fairfield, New Jersey, to the final destination: UH-60M MAIN WAREHOUSE located at 5 Skyline Crescent, Horningsea Park, Australia, with freight forwarding handled through DHL at a U.S.-based address in Brisbane, California. Packaging and marking requirements follow standardized government directives, mandating that all packages include the contract number, delivery order number, transport control number, and destination code, though specific MIL-STDs like 129 or 2073 are not explicitly cited. The awardee has certified as a Small Disadvantaged Business and a Women-Owned Small Business, triggering compliance obligations related to subcontracting plans and SAM.gov reporting. Invoicing must conform to DFARS 252.232-7003, which typically requires electronic submission through the Wide Area Workflow system, and payment will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio. Inspection and acceptance occur at origin, with responsibility vested in the U.S. government representative, Amanda Parker, while administrative oversight is managed by Holly Dunavant of DLA Aviation. No distinct Statement of Work or special contract requirements are detailed in this order, indicating that performance is governed entirely by the underlying base contract and standard logistics protocols. No bid evaluation factors, technical specifications, or performance standards beyond basic contractual conformity are outlined, and the delivery order appears to be a minimal-scope supply transaction under an Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity framework.