Notice of Recommended Award for Non-Competitive Procurement Contract for VTA Technology Department's Headquarters Relocation Project

The Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) has issued a notice recommending the award of a non-competitive procurement contract, numbered S26080, to FiberCon-USA LLC for services related to the Technology Department’s Headquarters Relocation Project in San Jose, California. The contract was posted on April 28, 2026, with a deadline for objections set for May 5, 2026, and the award remains contingent upon final approval by VTA Management. The contracting office is under the Professional Services Contracts division of California, with the primary point of contact being Tim Hopkins, Technology Manager, and Loveneet Kaur, Sr. Contracts Administrator. The place of performance is in California, with the contracting office located at San Jose, CA, 95134, and procurement-related inquiries should be directed to [email hidden], where Nicole Chapman, Chief Procurement Officer, serves as the point of contact. Despite the contractual nature of the award, no detailed statement of work, scope of deliverables, technical specifications, or performance requirements are provided in the available documentation, leaving the specific services to be rendered under this contract broadly defined. There is no indication of contract value, pricing structure, period of performance, or delivery schedule, and no funding information such as accounting codes or appropriation data is included. The procurement was conducted without competition, and no set-aside designations or socioeconomic certifications are indicated for the awardee. No contract clauses, evaluation factors, representations, certifications, or special requirements were included in the posted materials, and no attachments, packaging instructions, inspection procedures, or invoicing methods are specified. The absence of these elements suggests that the document serves only as a preliminary award notice, with the full contract terms likely contained in a separate, unprovided agreement. The contracting officer’s representative and technical oversight roles are not named, and no quality standards or acceptance criteria are outlined. All administrative details, including payment instructions and compliance reporting obligations, remain undetermined from the materials provided.