NR01B6

The contract SP450026F6418 is a firm-fixed-price delivery order awarded to HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC (CAGE 1X6Z1) under the indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract SP450023D0013, with a total value of $4,400.00 and an award date of July 14, 2026. The order pertains to the delivery of 25 cubic yards of non-regulated solid waste, specifically non-hazardous rags and debris, with FOB Destination delivery terms requiring shipment to Cranberry Township, PA, and performance to be completed no later than May 30, 2027. The contract includes specific clauses mandating compliance with NIST SP 800-171 for cybersecurity, DFARS requirements for safeguarding controlled unclassified information, and labor standards under FAR 52.222-41. It also enforces the Preference for Privately Owned U.S.-Flag Commercial Vessels clause, requiring documentation of ocean shipments and restricting the use of foreign-flag vessels without prior authorization. Subcontracting is limited to no more than 50% of the contract value for services, excluding materials, and this limitation must flow down to all applicable subcontracts. All packaging and documentation must be marked with designated identification numbers from Blocks 1 and 2, though no additional packaging, preservation, or labeling standards such as MIL-STD-129 or MIL-STD-2073 are specified. Payment is administered through the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, using the accounting code 97X4930 5CBX 001 2520 S33189, and invoices must be submitted via the standard DoD electronic system, likely WAWF, to the designated remittance address. The Contracting Officer’s Representative, Larry Kinley, and the Contracting/Ordering Officer, Erik Rundquist, are responsible for administration, with electronic correspondence directed to [email hidden]. The contract incorporates provisions for electronic funds transfer, installment payments for commercial services, and payments to small business subcontractors, while also enforcing clauses prohibiting procurement of covered telecommunications equipment, requiring ethical business conduct, and mandating whistleblower protections. Although no formal evaluation factors or weights are documented, the award appears to follow a price-based selection