PAD, HEAT TREATMENT

The contract solicitation SPE2DH-26-T-5507 seeks a single unit of a PAD, HEAT TREATMENT with NSN 6530-01-684-4258, designed to provide immediate heat at 112 degrees Fahrenheit when activated at room temperature, intended for single-use and packaged in cases of 24 units. The product must be delivered within 20 calendar days after award to Fort Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania, under FOB Destination terms, meaning the contractor bears all freight charges and risks until delivery. Packaging must comply with DLA’s RP001 and MIL-STD-2073-1E standards, with each unit sealed in a protective container and palletized appropriately for shipment. Shelf-life requirements mandate a minimum of 24 months from the manufacturer date and no more than three months between manufacturing and delivery. Labeling adheres to Medical Marking Standard No. 1 (MMS NO. 1), superseding MIL-STD-129, and must include manufacturer date, expiration or retest date, contract/lot number, and shelf-life identifiers per MMS1A. Hazardous materials, if any, must be labeled under 29 CFR 1910.1200 and accompanied by safety data sheets submitted prior to award. Inspection and acceptance occur at destination, governed by FAR 52.246-2 and supporting DLA standards such as RA001 and RP001. The solicitation is issued by the Defense Logistics Agency under NAICS code 332811, with responses due by August 3, 2026, submitted exclusively via DIBBS. The type of contract is fixed-price, as indicated by the use of FAR 52.243-1 and 52.216-1 Alternate I, and includes extensive federal acquisition regulation clauses covering small business representation, System for Award Management maintenance, prohibition on confidentiality agreements, NIST SP 800-171 compliance, safeguarding of contractor information systems, and requirements related to combating trafficking, employment eligibility verification, sustainable products, and hazard communication. Payment must be processed through Wide Area WorkFlow with no alternative invoicing methods permitted. No specific contract value is stated due to lack of pricing in the line-item table, and while the basis of award is not formally declared, the context suggests a price-competitive evaluation