PAD, NONADHERENT

The contract is for the procurement of 2 cases of nonadherent Telfa "Ouchless" dressings, each case containing 18 boxes of 50 individual 3-inch by 4-inch sterile cotton dressings, totaling 900 units per case. The item is identified by NSN 6510-01-687-9046 and is intended for use as a primary dressing on lightly draining wounds, designed not to adhere to healing tissue. Delivery is required within 20 days after order placement, with FOB destination terms, meaning the contractor assumes responsibility for transportation and risk until delivery at the destination, specifically Fort Bragg, North Carolina, with a zip code of 28310. The contract value is approximately $3,342.55 across multiple line items, with unit prices ranging from $110.00 to $182.00 per case, reflecting competitive pricing from various suppliers. The solicitation was issued under SPE2DS-26-T-276Z with a response deadline of August 3, 2026, and is administered by the Department of Defense’s Medical Supply Chain MD Surg FSF. Technical and quality requirements are governed by the DLA Master List of Technical and Quality Requirements, while packaging and marking must comply with MMS No. 1 for medical items, superseding MIL-STD-129, along with ASTM D3951 for commercial packaging and RP001 for palletization. Barcoding and labeling must meet machine-readable standards for logistics traceability, and hazardous material labeling follows 29 CFR 1910.1200. Inspection and acceptance occur at the destination by the government under FAR 52.246-2. Invoicing is mandatory via WAWF, and payment processing follows electronic submission protocols. The contract includes numerous FAR and DFARS clauses addressing contractor obligations such as combating trafficking, employment eligibility verification, sustainable products, hazardous materials compliance, transportation by sea, cybersecurity safeguards under NIST SP 800-171, and small business participation. Offerors must provide their UEI and CAGE code, declare size status and socioeconomic category eligibility, and comply with electronic submission through DIBBS. No evaluation factors are explicitly listed, but the nature of the procurement suggests a lowest-price technically acceptable approach, with preferences potentially applied to small business set-asides including HUBZone