PILOT ASSEMBLY, INNE

The contract under solicitation number SPE7MC25P2577, awarded on July 15, 2026, to FED CON LLC with CAGE code 85CZ7, pertains to the procurement of a Pilot Assembly, INNE (NSN 4820-01-192-0304) under the authority of the Defense Logistics Agency’s Land and Maritime division. The initial contract modification issued on August 14, 2025, specified a delivery of 13 units by December 12, 2025, at a unit price of $425.00, resulting in a total value of $5,525.00. However, this line item was subsequently cancelled via administrative modification under FAR 13.302(a) due to the contractor’s failure to perform, resulting in no deliveries being accepted and the contract value effectively reduced to zero. The contract type is not formally designated, though it falls under the NAICS code 332911 for pump and pumping equipment manufacturing, suggesting a commercial procurement pathway. The award was made without a formal set-aside classification, and no socioeconomic certifications, size status, or affirmative representations were identified in the documentation. The contracting officer, Marci Johnsen of DLA Land and Maritime, is the sole point of contact with responsibilities for administration, payment, and modification, operating from a mailing address in Columbus, Ohio. Payment is processed through the DLA Land and Maritime payment office, though specific remittance details are not provided. While WAWF is likely the expected invoicing system given DoD standard practice, it is not explicitly referenced. No packaging or marking requirements, inspection criteria, acceptance locations, or technical specifications such as MIL-STDs were included in the documentation. The place of performance and delivery location remain undefined, with only the contractor’s address in Opal Locka, Florida, noted. No Contracting Officer’s Representative or technical representative is assigned. There are no options, special requirements, security clearances, or key personnel obligations identified, and the contract appears to have been entirely administrative in nature, with modifications limited to cancellation under standard FAR clauses. The absence of clause listings, attachments, evaluation factors, or detailed contract terms suggests this was a simplified acquisition subject to routine administrative adjustment rather than a competitively evaluated, complex contract.