PIN, GROOVED, HEADED

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE4A625P0L09 to EPIC MACHINE, INC (CAGE 4QMA1) for the procurement of PIN, GROOVED, HEADED (NSN 5315-01-237-4929) and associated contractor-performed production lot testing, with a total contract value of $4,215.54. The award was issued on July 15, 2026, under solicitation SPE4A6-25-T-04LA, and the contract is structured as a firm-fixed-price agreement. Delivery of the primary item has been modified from April 23, 2026, to August 15, 2026, with the performance location identified as the contractor’s facility in Fenton, Michigan. The contracting officer, Joseph Semien of DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia, oversees the contract, while administrative oversight is managed by DCMA Ohio River Valley at Wright-Patterson AFB. No contracting officer’s representative or technical representative is designated. The contract requires compliance with the prohibition on ByteDance-covered applications, including TikTok, per OMB M-23-13, mandating that the contractor and all subcontractors prevent installation or use of such applications on any IT systems used for contract performance, with exceptions only upon written approval from the contracting officer. Although the contract includes two line items—hardware delivery and production lot testing—detailed quantities, unit pricing, and extended pricing are not provided. Packaging, marking, preservation, and inspection requirements are not explicitly outlined, though compliance with federal logistics standards is implied through the use of the National Stock Number and standard forms such as SF-30. The contract includes administrative modifications under FAR 43.203(b) but lacks formal clause numbering, evaluation factors, or socioeconomic certifications in the available documentation. Payment office details are indicated as DLA Aviation, though no specific invoicing method, accounting codes, or remittance instructions are provided. No attachments, certifications regarding small business status, or detailed inspection criteria are present in the contract record. The award appears to be based on a straightforward procurement of a standardized item with a minimal financial value, and compliance obligations are primarily centered on cybersecurity restrictions and delivery timing, with no option periods or additional performance requirements identified.