PISTON, HYDRAULIC DA

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded contract SPE4A025P1562 to Millennium Aerospace and Defense, identified by CAGE code 7TT37, for the delivery of hydraulic pistons under National Stock Number 1650-01-190-0530. The total contract value is $26,991.00, with the award issued on July 20, 2026, following modification P00002 that extended the delivery schedule to July 31, 2026, from the original date of May 26, 2026. The underlying solicitation, SPE4A7-25-T-650A, led to this single-source award, likely under a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable approach given the minimal documentation of competitive evaluation. Performance is directed to the contractor’s location in Cameron Park, California, though the official place of performance is unlisted, and the delivery method or FOB terms are not specified. Funding obligations are tied to fiscal year 2026 appropriations, with clause 252.232-7998 enabling advance obligation pending availability, subject to Prompt Payment Act penalties if delays occur due to funding status. The contract includes mandatory compliance with FAR 52.204-27, prohibiting the use of ByteDance-covered applications on any systems related to contract performance, and this requirement extends to subcontractors. Payment administration is managed by the DLA Aviation office in Richmond, Virginia, with Joanne Brisbon serving as the sole point of contact for contract administration, though no Contracting Officer’s Representative is named. Technical specifications for the hydraulic pistons are not detailed, and no inspection criteria, packaging standards, or quality assurance protocols are provided in the available documentation, suggesting reliance on broader DoD standards or supplemental technical data. The award includes three identical line items differentiated only by purchase request numbers, but quantities and unit pricing remain unspecified. No socioeconomic certifications, size representations, or affirmative disclosures from the contractor are evident, and no formal evaluation factors or source selection criteria are documented. A signed modification form labeled “ATTACH_sign_mod_by_both_parties” is referenced but its content is not accessible. The contract is administered under NAICS code 333995, and while the modification includes a $750 adjustment related to scheduling, it is unclear whether this represents a change in total obligation or a reallocation of